[mpls] Concluded - poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-akiya-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 09 December 2014 11:46 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F381A006B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 03:46:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KA8s2A3chPot for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 03:46:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CFD1A0126 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 03:46:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (unknown [49.149.192.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53D171801590; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:46:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5486E117.9070301@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:46:31 +0800
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <54716BEC.9050700@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <54716BEC.9050700@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/yZveODiixsaPhspSJ5nt9-x5NqQ
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-akiya-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org" <draft-akiya-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Concluded - poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-akiya-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:46:45 -0000
Working Group, This adoption poll has concluded, and we have a new working group document. Can the authors please re-post the draft with no other changes than administrative information (date and version) as draft-ietf-mpls- entropy-lsp-ping-00. /Loa for the wg chairs On 2014-11-23 13:09, Loa Andersson wrote: > Working Group, > > This is to start a two week poll on adopting > draft-akiya-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04 as an MPLS working group document. > > A bit if background, we had this document almost ready to go to the > working group adoption poll, but a discussion between authors and chairs > converged on that it would be beneficial to have to new IANA registries > set up. Since those registries would include code points defined in > other documents we could not define the registries in the current > document. We now have draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registry adopted as a > working group document, and can now progress draft-akiya-mpls-entropy- > lsp-ping. > > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working > group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical > motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that > the document should not be adopted as a working group document. > > There is two IPR disclosures directly against this document. > > The authors has all stated on the working group mailing > list that they are unaware of any other IPR claims against this draft > than the two disclosed. > > However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and > aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose > this is now. > > This poll ends December 8, 2014. > > /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Vero Zheng
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Katherine Zhao
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ad… venkatesan mahalingam
- [mpls] Concluded - poll to see if we have consens… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Concluded - poll to see if we have con… Nobo Akiya (nobo)