Re: [mpls] Preliminary Minutes of MPLS WG @ IETF 109
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 12 December 2020 05:13 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D961C3A0E52; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:13:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLDGrbSLXkvR; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:13:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1AEB3A0E50; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:13:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [124.104.17.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EDEF323990; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 06:13:09 +0100 (CET)
To: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE29801E8DA@dggeml530-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <00be8a1b-592e-5b8c-4404-f3d27f2f883b@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 13:13:06 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE29801E8DA@dggeml530-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/zNo9eHFO0bokTU5VQnQVNDaHTSs>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Preliminary Minutes of MPLS WG @ IETF 109
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:13:16 -0000
Mach, This is good too go from my point of view with the following correction. OLD Loa: Once start mpls-rt review or the chair starts to review a draft, we will mark the relevant drafts as “candidate WG adoption”. It’s somehow indicates that the draft is ready for WG adoption. NEW Loa: The name of this state in the data tracker promise more than it should. The name could be taken to indicate that we are ready to start the wgap. However, this state is the entry state into the data tracker, it indicates that if this document belongs in the IETF, it should be in MPLS. There some initial checks that needs to be done, and an MPLS-RT review to be done before we really could talk about it as a "candidate". /Loa On 04/12/2020 10:12, Mach Chen wrote: > Hi, > > Here (https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-109-mpls?view ) is the preliminary minutes of the MPLS WG session at IETF 109. There may be some minutes lost or inaccuracy. If so, please let us know and we will incorporate them into the final minutes. > > Best regards, > Mach > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64