[MSEC] [Fwd: Re: Any objections to adopting CTR mode draft as a WG item?]

Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com> Wed, 31 January 2007 01:50 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC4cI-0002zM-HG; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:50:30 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC4cH-0002z1-Hn for msec@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:50:29 -0500
Received: from ithilien.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.59]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HC4c8-0005h8-7C for msec@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:50:29 -0500
Received: from totoro.qualcomm.com (totoro.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.158]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id l0V1oIZX032073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <msec@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:50:19 -0800
Received: from [129.46.173.183] (ldondeti.na.qualcomm.com [129.46.173.183]) by totoro.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/1.0) with ESMTP id l0V1oH0A017911 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <msec@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <45BFF590.4060200@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:49:04 -0800
From: Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: msec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Subject: [MSEC] [Fwd: Re: Any objections to adopting CTR mode draft as a WG item?]
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/msec>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: msec-bounces@ietf.org


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Any objections to adopting CTR mode draft as a WG item?
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:30:04 -0500
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
To: Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com>, msec@ietf.org
References: <45BEA651.3040206@qualcomm.com>

I do not think that a recharter is needed to work on this document of
the MSEC WG chooses to do so.

Russ


At 08:58 PM 1/29/2007, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
>Folks,
>
>draft-weis-esp-group-counter-cipher-00  was presented at San Diego 
>and was discussed at length.  One could argue that this is out of 
>scope for our charter, although the charter does not explicitly 
>disallow multi-sender operation (here is the relevant line from the 
>charter: "Initial efforts will focus on scalable solutions for 
>groups with a single source and a very large number of recipients. 
>"  Ok, we have been at this for some 7 years and can no longer claim 
>to be in initial stages, but you know what I mean.).
>
>At the meeting 6 people thought this should be a work item and no 
>one objected.  Any thoughts?
>
>Russ, could you tell us if we can do this without rechartering?
>
>thanks,
>Lakshminath
>



_______________________________________________
MSEC mailing list
MSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec