[MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3599)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 20 April 2013 17:00 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3160321F8EBE for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxmCkTPpQBvF for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6BD21F8629 for <msec@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2BE13B1E003; Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: bew@cisco.com, sheela@cisco.com, hardjono@mit.edu, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, bew@cisco.com, vincent.roca@inria.fr
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130420165927.2BE13B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:59:20 -0700
Cc: msec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, claude.brieredelisle@wanadoo.fr
Subject: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3599)
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/msec>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 17:00:40 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6407, "The Group Domain of Interpretation". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6407&eid=3599 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Claude Briere de L'Isle <claude.brieredelisle@wanadoo.fr> Section: 5.5.1 Original Text ------------- o DST ID Port (2 octets) -- Value specifying a port associated with the source ID. A value of zero means that the DST ID Port field MUST be ignored. Corrected Text -------------- o DST ID Port (2 octets) -- Value specifying a port associated with the destination ID. A value of zero means that the DST ID Port field MUST be ignored. Notes ----- Brian Weiss wrote "You are correct, this should be "destination ID"". Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6407 (draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-11) -------------------------------------- Title : The Group Domain of Interpretation Publication Date : October 2011 Author(s) : B. Weis, S. Rowles, T. Hardjono Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multicast Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3599) RFC Errata System