RE: [MSEC] MSEC status update

Hi Lakshminath,

seems fine from my point of view. Would you see the MIKEYv2 proposal in
the scope of MSEC or in a different group.

Ciao
 	Steffen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lakshminath Dondeti [mailto:ldondeti@qualcomm.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:48 AM
> To: msec@ietf.org
> Subject: [MSEC] MSEC status update
> 
> Folks,
> 
> After a long hiatus, I am back on this with high priority.  
> First of all, my sincere apologies for dropping this for so 
> long.  I was in India for about 4 weeks, after that catching 
> up on things at work and generally postponing MSEC work until 
> today.  A few of you prompted me, and I have tried to get 
> some work done before today, but it just did not work out.  
> Anyway, that is behind us and let us get going with some 
> energy so we can finish the work and close MSEC soon.
> 
> We have a lot to do and I would like MSEC to stop meeting 
> after Chicago, if all goes well.  I have scheduled time for 
> us in Prague, so please plan for it accordingly.
> 
> That out of the way, we have the following drafts at the WG 
> completion or near completion stage:
> 
> I.
> MIKEY-applicability: Has finished last call and I will be 
> forwarding it to Russ shortly.
> 
> II.
> ECC: Are we ready to do a WG last call on this?
> MSEC-IPsec : Same question: Are we ready to do WGLC?
> GDOI-Update: Ditto
> 
> Did I miss any from that category?
> 
> III.
> We desperately need to finish the following drafts ASAP:
> GKDP:
> 
> IV.
> TESLA-ALC-NORM:  What is the status on this?
> draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-composite-group:  Ditto!
> 
> V.
> New work (to be adopted after asking for group's opinion):
> GDOI-SRTP: My opinion is that it is a good idea to have 
> draft-baugher-msec-gdoi-srtp taken up as a WG item.  I will 
> ask group opinion on this today.
> TESLA-IPsec: Ditto (Note: I wrote it, but I am merely an 
> editor trying to finish the work; the original authors, 
> except for Ran are not active in the group any longer.  This 
> is a gap filling exercise anyway, so I feel comfortable that 
> there are no conflicts of interest here.  I will ask the 
> group of course).
> draft-weis-esp-group-counter-cipher-00: Ditto.
> 
> Again, let me know if I missed anything?
> 
> 
> Thanks for your patience folks.  Let's get some work done.
> 
> best regards,
> Lakshminath
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MSEC mailing list
> MSEC@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec
> 

_______________________________________________
MSEC mailing list
MSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec