IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3861)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 07 January 2014 10:02 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AD31AD8CD for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 02:02:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RzNSkXRVHhOv for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 02:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0CD1AD627 for <msec@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 02:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C72DD7FC159; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 02:02:06 -0800 (PST)
To: bew@cisco.com, sheela@cisco.com, hardjono@mit.edu, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, bew@cisco.com, vincent.roca@inria.fr
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140107100206.C72DD7FC159@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 02:02:06 -0800
Cc: msec@ietf.org, prashantog@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3861)
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/msec/>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:02:18 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6407,
"The Group Domain of Interpretation".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6407&eid=3861

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Prashant Gupta <prashantog@gmail.com>

Section: Introduction

Original Text
-------------
Secure group and multicast applications require a method by which
   each group member shares common security policy and keying material.
   This document describes the Group Domain of Interpretation (GDOI),
   which is an Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol
   (ISAMKP) [RFC2408] Domain of Interpretation (DOI), a group key
   management system. 

Corrected Text
--------------
Secure group and multicast applications require a method by which
   each group member shares common security policy and keying material.
   This document describes the Group Domain of Interpretation (GDOI),
   which is an Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol
   (ISAKMP) [RFC2408] Domain of Interpretation (DOI), a group key
   management system. 

Notes
-----


Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6407 (draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The Group Domain of Interpretation
Publication Date    : October 2011
Author(s)           : B. Weis, S. Rowles, T. Hardjono
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multicast Security
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email