Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3861)
William Atwood <william.atwood@concordia.ca> Tue, 07 January 2014 15:24 UTC
Return-Path: <william.atwood@concordia.ca>
X-Original-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7E31ADF32 for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:24:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEkweFtGTr0y for <msec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:24:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.96.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849A41ADBD7 for <msec@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 07:24:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (bill@poise.encs.concordia.ca [132.205.2.209]) by oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca (envelope-from william.atwood@concordia.ca) (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id s07FOANP021553; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:24:10 -0500
Message-ID: <52CC1C1E.4080908@concordia.ca>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:24:14 -0500
From: William Atwood <william.atwood@concordia.ca>
Organization: Concordia University, Montreal
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, bew@cisco.com, sheela@cisco.com, hardjono@mit.edu, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, vincent.roca@inria.fr
References: <20140107100206.C72DD7FC159@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140107100206.C72DD7FC159@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on oldperseverance.encs.concordia.ca at 2014/01/07 10:24:10 EST
Cc: msec@ietf.org, prashantog@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3861)
X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Security List <msec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/msec/>
List-Post: <mailto:msec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec>, <mailto:msec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:24:37 -0000
It took me using "diff" to find what is reported as an error. s/ISAMKP/ISAKMP/ in line 5. Yes, this is an error. However, my suggestion is to re-word the paragraph as follows: Secure group and multicast applications require a method by which each group member shares common security policy and keying material. This document describes a group key management system called the Group Domain of Interpretation (GDOI), which is an Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP) [RFC2408] Domain of Interpretation (DOI). Bill On 07/01/2014 5:02 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6407, > "The Group Domain of Interpretation". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6407&eid=3861 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Prashant Gupta <prashantog@gmail.com> > > Section: Introduction > > Original Text > ------------- > Secure group and multicast applications require a method by which > each group member shares common security policy and keying material. > This document describes the Group Domain of Interpretation (GDOI), > which is an Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol > (ISAMKP) [RFC2408] Domain of Interpretation (DOI), a group key > management system. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Secure group and multicast applications require a method by which > each group member shares common security policy and keying material. > This document describes the Group Domain of Interpretation (GDOI), > which is an Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol > (ISAKMP) [RFC2408] Domain of Interpretation (DOI), a group key > management system. > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6407 (draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-11) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The Group Domain of Interpretation > Publication Date : October 2011 > Author(s) : B. Weis, S. Rowles, T. Hardjono > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Multicast Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > MSEC mailing list > MSEC@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec > -- Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng. tel: +1 (514) 848-2424 x3046 Distinguished Professor Emeritus fax: +1 (514) 848-2830 Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering Concordia University EV 3.185 email:william.atwood@concordia.ca 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~bill Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8
- Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3… Sean Turner
- [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3861) RFC Errata System
- Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3… William Atwood
- Re: [MSEC] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6407 (3… William Atwood
- [MSEC] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6407 … RFC Errata System