Re: [Msr6] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

"Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com> Tue, 06 December 2022 04:07 UTC

Return-Path: <xiejingrong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: msr6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: msr6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E766C14CF14; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 20:07:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PER7OqBFiAqn; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 20:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB9FC14CF11; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 20:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NR6Kx41BHz6H6lp; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:06:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100003.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.122) by lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 04:07:10 +0000
Received: from kwepemi500004.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.17) by kwepemi100003.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:07:08 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.17]) by kwepemi500004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.17]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.031; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:07:08 +0800
From: "Xiejingrong (Jingrong)" <xiejingrong@huawei.com>
To: "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>, "msr6@ietf.org" <msr6@ietf.org>
CC: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment
Thread-Index: AdkDOXX5fD56cgadQLyJ82sZgqL1jQADKE6BAXPS8CAAAndhAA==
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 04:07:08 +0000
Message-ID: <835023a7eeb0446bb8617585a348953f@huawei.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB4206165672BF331105525F8CD2139@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB4206ED2C8B32DDE31D23E7FDD2139@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.202.42]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_835023a7eeb0446bb8617585a348953fhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/msr6/2pP246_dhm6I_EKFdJSOvmlwumQ>
Subject: Re: [Msr6] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment
X-BeenThere: msr6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Source Routing IPv6 <msr6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/msr6>, <mailto:msr6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/msr6/>
List-Post: <mailto:msr6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:msr6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msr6>, <mailto:msr6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 04:07:16 -0000

Hi  PIM & MSR6 :

I feel the last-calling document in SPRING may be useful to understand MSR6 and related work.

This Spring document[1] defines an SRv6 SID End.Replicate to perform a multipoint transport behavior statefully.
The MSR6 document[2] defines an SRv6 SID End.RGB to perform a multipoint transport behavior statelessly.

This Spring document [1] uses an SRv6 SID and IPv6 extension header.
The MSR6 document [2] uses an SRv6 SID and IPv6 extension header.

This document [1] clearly stated that “...to establish P2MP trees in SR domain”.
The document [3], as the preceding research of MSR6,  stated that, “… the BIERv6 domain is the same as SRv6 domain”.

This document [1] clearly demonstrates how the idea of “using a unicast forwarding plane to perform multipoint transport” is adopted.
This argument [4] about MSR6 is that “using a unicast forwarding plane to perform multipoint transport” is bad/failed idea (please correct me if I understand it wrong).

This Spring document[1] has reached its lastcall in the wide IETF community.
The MSR6 document [2], and the preceding research[3], has been blocked  since 2019(may be earlier than the End.Replicate), and the claim about it had been variable over time:

l  Firstly, the claim was that, SRv6 is a new thing and unmature and some terriable hijack.

l  And then, the claim was that, it does not comply with BIER architecture.

l  And then, the claim was that, the BIER wg don’t need it or work on it.

l  And then, the claim was that, the MSR6 makes no difference than BIER.

l  And sometimes, the claim was that, using unicast forwarding plane is bad/failed (loop).
(Due to the so long timeline of these discussions, I do not have the link on each of above claim, but if it is interested, I can try to find them)

Thanks,
Jingrong

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C754580bd81ff45ecdb9108dad152afe7%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C638052450380683369%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Jf7bnxwWGDztXPD1FvW%2Bi%2BVAb3qnqOBUGudZK4KiGEY%3D&reserved=0>
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lx-msr6-rgb-segment/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-xie-bier-ipv6-encapsulation-10
[4] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/msr6/eMUWpjSbo3THJLEXe_t1Pt5PTyc/


本邮件及其附件可能含有华为公司的保密信息,仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用(包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发)本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件,请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件!
This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!

From: pim [mailto:pim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 12:26 AM
To: pim@ietf.org<mailto:pim@ietf.org>
Subject: [pim] Fwd: WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

FYI

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com<mailto:james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>>
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 10:10 AM
To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>>
Cc: spring-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:spring-chairs@ietf.org> <spring-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:spring-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

Dear WG:

This email starts a 2-week Working Group Last Call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7C754580bd81ff45ecdb9108dad152afe7%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C638052450380683369%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Jf7bnxwWGDztXPD1FvW%2Bi%2BVAb3qnqOBUGudZK4KiGEY%3D&reserved=0>

Please read the updated document if you haven’t already and send your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than December 12th 2022.

If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.

Lastly, if you are an author or contributor please respond to indicate whether you know of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.

Thanks!

Jim, Joel & Bruno