[Mtgvenue] Question on text about change of process

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> Thu, 02 February 2017 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CC01299A0 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:55:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hucbYwmxKLWP for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D15701294E3 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 189so7478103pfu.3 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 11:55:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version; bh=B8loJ3+osh1Le6rvZ45/54ihVti+jV2G0fG96eDoleA=; b=zOE+BBpi0gXp6Cje20G/vHqK7JGC+MISCtGjOijsmtcpT7bI1qrfanlBc9MzEPA+4O v8lfaijSKhd1xL8LvGNn+XLTFORJ2bnBa/4KDUrhYRbILUu9FB5hEMKrY4OHtfCxstBT oHl4rwUch3TKIlSHVn+FN7n/kgc5Se5y2H1HPnwmaZhHmncHWIYSgpDyvxMVNuu57QS9 8rlET8AYLXzHC7aKs+B8/GJzy2e7PQkPZw8quGrlVkP4FQzoXRphtCuIhtjrromU9lpd 4ax01ikv+U1cD9oWO3M5gwFTORkyAiCInHIBhHN1L9C1Qd7tO79v4J8RNA/lSYGQwpVq Yd7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version; bh=B8loJ3+osh1Le6rvZ45/54ihVti+jV2G0fG96eDoleA=; b=V5St63E7pRQ/FLR1MQn/+14mVATySNPpacBq60FO9AIitdEhlUVK57DVJYlqa9BzeT bqwfdU2JeMWjGl9ExAYBspoWLzLys1dqfWxZsdBd2ApoAEsSfU7XlsnKR44qxgCahkli /ofV+qSLwqHRFWlFrbP2yC3UjsRftoP6KSmoY+9LoYoeMaD6i/mqLjZujO3DjsCbUG2l meRxKCIYZwX+athFiX5a2V226q/kvdahqOWTk0s+XI8ALbmZAdSR2BO1JXjKGJkyfKbM RbqTkh3/Af4TUt1EaR71FQ4u31wS1TsyYNqIfUnqx5Uc0HTcVVpU9D9ritpG17B0cLx/ 9F2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIZsb/cWHc96Dvc8U4Fc8B7ErH3zzyYKcpa+2EOUjdTDRNKkfQVFbemdXNZqjZBuA==
X-Received: by 10.98.144.22 with SMTP id a22mr12991859pfe.160.1486065324223; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 11:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (209-112-217-13-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [209.112.217.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j185sm61057911pgd.35.2017.02.02.11.55.23 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Feb 2017 11:55:23 -0800 (PST)
To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Message-ID: <afa22b35-c538-87ce-6d24-987e6ee1bc38@nomountain.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 10:55:21 -0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nlgaq5iCmv6bj45QrxBEmj5FNUMF5tmJD"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/HCIADb4nuJ6ka_YKdJCs_DsPwmw>
Subject: [Mtgvenue] Question on text about change of process
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 19:55:26 -0000

Hi, all:

When we discussed this a few days ago, Brian had proposed the
following text:

 If the IAOC has decided to waive any requirements for a
 particular location, or to consider additional requirements,
 this will also be noted on the web page.

Jari proposed an addition:

 While this document uses these terms and these meanings, it remains
 the responsibility of the IAOC to apply their best judgment. The IAOC
 accepts input and feedback both during the consultation process and
 later (for instance when there are changes in the situation at a
 chosen location). Any appeals remain subject to the provisions of
 [RFC4071].

Is there any objection to either of these additions?

Melinda