Re: [Mtgvenue] Review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-04

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 30 January 2017 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C7C12940A for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:26:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wDQe_cqWJDJ for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22c.google.com (mail-pg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98CB3129575 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 3so44773864pgj.3 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:26:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c3JXDzIlL77IP0C5SZA6Xi/I6tZsa10Mf8HVwNSvz0M=; b=dlznwMVvmIiCBe2SVgYR3CZDleenqWZnpVb8zMjfwHtG8IHfFNPms5b/Nq0/D0jmuP YYQxKgYn5twcH/SJvIrKfQcoSSJIHgLWJ0+sE8fOgi9UxZa7pCkyzQBX/ChraZN8+I2q e4MzHF0vRIFXvLRqm9qXHgB5vIfgeWnqwv7aHDWrFy6REfKIB81+iijDHtwR+egLwVPA OvsiLyd0tqeTRc0Gwo5HQ8oKSYk6VDjQzAddhs7TXkSd+r8luWG1HHGDpA4tF0LXHTGc DKY0T1CgrNmaItyaJZSedfxHaICbawxRvZ6a0jkHr/HzlY8np4ZX4XyMD6Wx7fXcmTyV Jcng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=c3JXDzIlL77IP0C5SZA6Xi/I6tZsa10Mf8HVwNSvz0M=; b=CkYgH2ZUId/0l9ra5U01ET6D76yjZGvDmuyCF/Kn+ArdYRossL6TjQf6WrBZCWoCR4 7/BROTAY43okzFf6xYl5Geg190261bsghcqTCzSUF0iOJ6lBpXe549XGCGQBRJL/P9q2 NwVmlSgRwR90G+GdsIXn2Fa3gWW97pxts1Wsk+WaI2dZTRjw+DoqXIA1vhpsUW1/gB5e +m5AdF7d5aNYpkMllTOkmcwhYaTlpaqWhaXR/z2bH1/0qQvAOAkthqf59GrCg+9CR8Tj g8ECWQI4oFCW6wAygUsKzOhgSbqkSXfLtZf7u6JEibNTCvFlwkci3SZkf+v/4CvgKvL+ SXZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL05iY2egEFSAHC6aqgg1gpAn2y0haxcQBrpkXuneypcwRQO80Er9EYgKNQm0QhBw==
X-Received: by 10.99.153.1 with SMTP id d1mr23900306pge.44.1485804372895; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:26:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7505:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7505:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a2sm34578974pfc.72.2017.01.30.11.26.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:26:12 -0800 (PST)
To: John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <DFD97C10-83BB-4BDB-A4BB-11420089C56F@sinodun.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <a531bba9-b029-facc-063a-761d5902d14a@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:26:09 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DFD97C10-83BB-4BDB-A4BB-11420089C56F@sinodun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/O6hkjDEj80TlHBqZtVkmXcoxETU>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-04
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:26:15 -0000

John,

> In general, the document is very light on accessibility issues and 
> perhaps, given the wide range of potential disabilities, the authors 
> could consider getting some professional advice. Maybe it is something 
> the ADA could help with??

Possibly this issue is complex enough that it needs to be the subject
of a separate document (which doesn't especially need to be an RFC).
In this document we could focus on the IAOC's responsibilities to
address this topic and to seek advice. You raise the issue of rough
sidewalks, which for most of us was just an annoyance in Toronto; I'm
sure that people with poor sight or hearing have their own issues at
certain meetings.

Regards
   Brian

On 31/01/2017 07:58, John Dickinson wrote:
> Thanks to all who have put so much work into this draft and to the past 
> meeting organisers who have organised many fantastic meetings.
> 
> As a wheelchair user I have a few comments…
> 
> §3.1. There is no mention of accessible transport between airport and 
> hotel. At every meeting I have to remotely pre-book a wheelchair 
> accessible taxi for the airport transfer, some of which (even though 
> arranged via the venue hotel) turned out to be unsuitable/unsafe. At the 
> last Hawaii IETF we were told that there was only one wheelchair capable 
> taxi on the entire island that had to be booked days in advance for any 
> trip!
> 
> §3.2. Could someone explain the reasoning behind the different 
> requirements levels for “The Facility permits easy wheelchair 
> access.” and “The Facility is accessible by people with 
> disabilities.”? I have just seen the discussion between Dave and 
> Stephen. Dave, could your comments defending the difference be added to 
> the draft to justify the distinction.
> 
> §3.4 Same question again. Also, I would like to see some mention of a 
> pool of accessible rooms being available in the IETF reservation and 
> that those rooms be reserved for people who require them. I don’t know 
> how large this pool needs to be. In Yokohama due to maintenance at the 
> hotel there were no fully wheelchair accessible rooms in the hotel.
> 
> §3.5 “as well as areas within a reasonable walking distance
> or conveniently accessible by a short taxi, bus, or
> subway ride, have convenient and inexpensive
> choices for meals that can accommodate a wide range
> of dietary requirements.”
> 
> A reasonable number of the areas and restaurants also need to be 
> accessible. In Toronto, and Berlin we ended up using a bike lock to 
> secure my chair in the street. IIRC the state of the sidewalks in 
> Toronto were almost inaccessible for people without disabilities! The 
> pavements in Bueno Aires were also heavily damaged in places.
> 
> Venue and Lodging:
> In several recent meetings there have been areas of the hotel or venue 
> that were off limits due to wheelchair lifts that could only be operated 
> by a member of staff with a key. I am lucky enough that I can still walk 
> short distances but for others it would (in Toronto I think) have 
> prevented access to the bar!
> 
> Heavy doors: It is often the case that meeting room doors are so heavy 
> they could not be opened by an unaccompanied wheelchair user.
> 
> I have been to several meetings (not just ietf) where coaches to social 
> events could not accommodate a non-collapsible chair. I either walk on 
> the coach and hope that the other end does not involve too much walking 
> or I have to make my own way there.
> 
> In general, the document is very light on accessibility issues and 
> perhaps, given the wide range of potential disabilities, the authors 
> could consider getting some professional advice. Maybe it is something 
> the ADA could help with??
> 
> I know we don’t live in a perfect world and I don’t expect 
> everything I described to be perfect in every location but at least 
> these things (among may others) should be considered.
> 
> John Dickinson
> 
> http://sinodun.com
> 
> Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd.
> Magdalen Centre
> Oxford Science Park
> Robert Robinson Avenue
> Oxford OX4 4GA
> U.K.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> Mtgvenue@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
>