IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-00.txt

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Sun, 19 March 2017 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83211289C3 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCvxpk92_az3 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x232.google.com (mail-pg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0F7D1287A7 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id g2so65050404pge.3 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=VMKFzB/i9stVBs0VM4kz9EB39lRgicKOIpVDCh8Zd+8=; b=EOWBj6O+qucsqvIUYboVUhnDWANusNTN+fosslqekl0VAq54RTBXBWwgcbDUVUACJa AfpYzqcoznomk97MF2KnYtDXtG/LurHlUp9udV3lKRBVUkjn/zW9XY5Xw5rYFTSPXQAd IvXtsDKt5LKB4R9hTbN1tB8DZuud9u94xj/EXiq3vVz8Xsk4TGkppZsDc0ISzyojPp7k NS5bf6yWSgurv1sJOgZPJpNVc81uNNsQ9KVZvlPp6aw7IBjPr74jsy65ahUcFeQGTpwO Wh3TKTRwMxqbTWWJF1q6bZVpZd0S7HODP4nGc71WSJbEF5Wcl4AxDS4P2308uWCb5GYR Imqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=VMKFzB/i9stVBs0VM4kz9EB39lRgicKOIpVDCh8Zd+8=; b=DJoYSBtGAgz8zL64laC+ywAbSToSt14lINZ+AQdd6Lw2Z8iKLQ4o04vhMdxF158akx cRnNZajkSaUW22F24CqlvDqgWPGWhqMkp8U+y69X3zdKCTV09V3MOujfh2pgFps7Lg6E Hrl16wSYuU9ZTFa+o9Rpb5Qc1CC3eibZqq6MyYLW5lcJyDH+txtARC5vgzY9+lKBjjho w6fvKd+BLEkjtecrpeHeKyLyvm+vxl/e+htp2QwrPmlcuJuxAsA0/e/jDJs/asBbXjSR FzhCSCYGepEOzgYWehH4cHycmSFDfxX8bof29qmdZ53BG7G9huCl5vTrSvMAE77xtINV xUDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2jVCFojy9LIrueppJ1LV6lyMc9klPbkkR4v9KEXY3HHgOkIKLLdNWil5Wcx+lbHQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.42.200 with SMTP id q191mr4635094pfq.73.1489938092528; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4d01:db10:e99f:84e4:25ac:980d? ([2601:647:4d01:db10:e99f:84e4:25ac:980d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 73sm27923421pfj.31.2017.03.19.08.41.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <4D4DCE6E-8A93-4431-B386-0521A8BDB009@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2D6CDABC-4ECF-404F-B87F-F539E8184E44"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 08:41:30 -0700
In-Reply-To: <dcb60583-9303-05e7-7101-3a62168adaec@gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <148916873347.6794.11598795513600626721@ietfa.amsl.com> <dcb60583-9303-05e7-7101-3a62168adaec@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/VN0etO81sqF80a6-Nosm_VQ7KfM>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 15:41:35 -0000

Brian,

> On Mar 19, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> NOTE: There have not been many such exploratory meetings in the past
>>   (with IETF95 in Buenos Aires and IETF47 in Adelaide being the
>>   exceptional instances).
> 
> It's still my opinion that we should recognize IETF27 (Amsterdam)
> and IETF54 (Yokohama) as examples of the "-*" policy that successfully
> pioneered Europe and Asia as IETF destinations.

Good point.

> 
> It's also still my opinion that we should identify the regions by
> RIR coverage; naming the continents is a bit vague.

Interesting idea, but the APNIC region is very broad.  Though our use of Asia is probably worse.  We tend to mean Japan, China, Korea, etc., not the middle east, nor probably India.

Bob


> 
> Regards
>   Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> Mtgvenue@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email