Re: [Mtgvenue] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process-15: (with COMMENT)

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Jun 8, 2018, at 12:13 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> Alexey,
> 
> Are you thinking of the top of section 3 saying something like, "This 
> section contains the criteria for IETF meetings based on the objectives 
> described in section 2."? I think that's easy enough to do, and 
> perfectly reasonable.

I don't think all of you objectives in Section 2 are satisfied by Section 3, but the above text would help.

> pr
> 
> On 7 Jun 2018, at 6:13, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> 
> > Hi Eliot,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, at 11:56 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> >> It's informative. 
> >
> > Can you maybe say so more clearly in the document?
> >
> >> While there's no explicit linkage, the intent was
> >> indeed to link the requirements in Section 3 to Section 2, but to 
> >> some
> >> pragmatic extent.
> >>
> >> Eliot
> >>
> >> On 07.06.18 06:09, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> COMMENT:
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for this document.
> >>>
> >>> I am wondering what is the relationship between the section "2.1.  
> >>> Core Values"
> >>> and Section 3? I don't think all of core values are expressed as 
> >>> requirements.
> >>> Is section 2 (and 2.1) Informative?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Email had 1 attachment:
> >> + signature.asc
> >>   1k (application/pgp-signature)