IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Fwd: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Mon, 30 January 2017 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F26112996A for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:57:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5iqGinRNQJIc for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:57:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 036931293FD for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:57:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c85so197619564wmi.1 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:57:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=i4qoQPuwoB0ga+k8eMuyV2euQux8/azr/sJq+BOY0zw=; b=mkYLHWtID/upXrLwpzRuxjbr4HqRE7HItKdDE5iON4/tTb64xG6LrBYQF7m4NIHBnL qe2cxcHC/dO4APuzwU9lsyhLlmkad5itU3BRGE9r0HyNmIrFngiqYQcxbuU++nMa3DJF XqgmYGdXwpeEVB86W/adW8wtOyXxmIuSJAwx5vrm4LMWYhXcFQWJJywo1xsrGz+Pm/Id RDD9DDoZe4dJAcb+vO2438hfyyk8Q0SX62cXvGb/pu1xGhOen3+GxbajaGEtpKf6ht+m DPhuahwt+ojbWWQ5wfhoE0SCyZf4x7kSEtByHbwSz/hwH7ld27QavJykjITvaYp4rxV8 XP6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=i4qoQPuwoB0ga+k8eMuyV2euQux8/azr/sJq+BOY0zw=; b=QTnXvvpMGTwkP06/jyBdXXNnS66f0wQdUjsV5zl7XxGSP8fZj1pitQw5IWszz3d1/O WsinizMvLbtPqgreTzWTe23QiOQn3pYHArW0JZWjNwqhdi08dDZU8jmdOu8cHw+tNl2Z VIKuzlq/amD1+HyEpBiIPitfhNJiz9NV6llQnN1NXL9GfL/DXmZrkCR6Y4seGctkC4Fl 0bUOKZl7PaTgQUj3yzpGG1WWQy+l1b6oYXF0Qq1Rcr7f2WJ5zwtDvG4Hn7eweKuHxnAP pT9wrMkSrfZFW6HIbrvyTAa43TBuR8/qPtEgnylgtHlwB2Ub206LJiV1TJt/vBG03/TQ dixA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLETXkqOuGlWfwHHbRrmJCJnLbQZODdg5Vn0iiuWHxSlVZFzkEsa4Oc9UY9dzT59iAW3dymIH6jg4WvBw==
X-Received: by 10.28.140.140 with SMTP id o134mr13309436wmd.87.1485752271252; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:57:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.91.2 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.91.2 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:57:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3a4a40c4-5c10-b2d6-1f18-466138a1f4ea@nomountain.net>
References: <20170127194324.GB38766@mx2.yitter.info> <c65c5fb0-2dba-4132-47eb-8239291c6f7a@dcrocker.net> <CAD_dc6jz6C2bjv6m-Exm_Gv7PkGRk1sW=xE-1F3K7SXiq88e9Q@mail.gmail.com> <3a4a40c4-5c10-b2d6-1f18-466138a1f4ea@nomountain.net>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:57:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6icgXXK6yiFZhDex09MKrCzA9fXmWAdsv6tYROUtrwZ=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1145b0385a355d054748a87c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/pmO-fLu5kOhVxIzO8mWX-wjpYEY>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Fwd: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:57:54 -0000

That's fine but that was what the subject of this thread implied. It should
have been clear from the first message that it is out of scope. Wonder
though why it's being discussed if it's out of scope but I think Andrew's
response captures things well and provides clarifications.

Thanks

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Jan 29, 2017 19:34, "Melinda Shore" <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> wrote:

> On 1/29/17 7:50 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> > FWIW, I think it may be good to present this accurately as the IETF
> > shouldn't flow with media captions.
>
> Hi, Seun:
>
> Questions like that are out of scope of the working group.  We're
> just trying to establish a policy to provide guidance to the IAOC
> and processes to follow when making decisions about meeting
> location.
>
> Melinda
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> Mtgvenue@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email