Re: [multimob] I-D Action: draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-04.txt

"Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> Wed, 19 March 2014 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=14840e990=schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EF51A07FF for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TB3n3lNq3QmK for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de (mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.6.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5D51A0805 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([141.22.30.74]) by mail3.is.haw-hamburg.de with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 19 Mar 2014 22:53:47 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA0410679D7; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:53:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25646-02; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:53:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [141.22.28.186] (unknown [141.22.28.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C438910679CF; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:53:46 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <532A11E4.4060404@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:53:40 +0100
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, multimob@ietf.org
References: <20140316113858.12029.20135.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5329E98E.1020205@venaas.com>
In-Reply-To: <5329E98E.1020205@venaas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.haw-hamburg.de
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/9rcWfu516Un5KOTNvxl64Eb8YVM
Cc: draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [multimob] I-D Action: draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-04.txt
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob/>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:54:02 -0000

Hi Stig,

thanks for looking at the details carefully!

All should be fixed in the present submission.

Thomas

On 19.03.2014 20:01, Stig Venaas wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for posting this much improved version. I have some comments on
> this one too though. Can others in the WG please also see if they are
> happy with this latest one?
>
> Here are my minor comments.
>
> Mark it as an update of RFC5568.
>
> Typo in 4.1.2: indicatior
>
> IN 4.2.2 it says:
>
>     The PMAG then waits for receiving the Multicast Acknowledgement
>     Option(s) with a HACK message (see Section 5.4) and the creation of
>     the bidirectional tunnel with NMAG.
>
> Better language to write "wait until it receives"?
>
> Also:
>
>     It SHOULD start forwarding traffic down the
>     tunnel interface for those groups an MLD listener report was
>     received from NMAG.
>
> Add "for which"? "For those groups for which an MLD"...
>
> 5.2:
> In most of the document you use FBACK and HACK, but here you refer
> to them as FBAck and HAck.
>
> Appendix A:
> You write "In this section", but perhaps say appendix?
>
> Remove change log? Not that useful in the RFC I think.
>
> Stig
>

-- 

Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner Tor 7 °
° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, Germany °
° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet                   Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt    Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 °