IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multimob] [netlmm] Multimob PMIPv6 Multicast Support drafts

"Seil Jeon" <sijeon79@gmail.com> Thu, 17 September 2009 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sijeon79@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: multimob@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B5F28C1F1; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v5n+hTu8PXK7; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f181.google.com (mail-px0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA48928C1F9; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so4689985pxi.17 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:reply-to:from:to:cc :references:subject:date:organization:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to :x-mimeole:thread-index; bh=eXmWzH4dOSTMctX1MfzZHzLontDJM0niXPYWvik1xn8=; b=DplzNnGLrQLM6lPkjeCMjoK4z6Y98M9o1xRkCQsqmUli9AfZfWXI4UfMEdCTC5XdMY 5nd8bqGvtpBjH1tctpoNrwPLtUGwv0J/zscUcBjEBBoQZMa1369b2ryM7hVMLQMFa26I udrQ4bkjOsCJX8AKZMTDC10JH1sE2QL46UAwk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=reply-to:from:to:cc:references:subject:date:organization:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index; b=U7FtqGoSRGXReR5qfzEr2RpFWs+xwR0hWyaxMvlhWrrX1l1897Ds1bG6Z9FoBlqhYF 1fqS8bQflZLNBvxRdC1gvHMMGbtQ5f/07YK78f4Pd6bdMvk6JiYnyL5iHVpAuPsyOvOQ lJcBjFYf8tnYvjMrvzw+uFHes/vqjJZCaaQSM=
Received: by 10.114.6.3 with SMTP id 3mr18380442waf.166.1253184170829; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dcn0d4b06d5df0 ([220.149.84.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1743703pzk.15.2009.09.17.03.42.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Seil Jeon <sijeon79@gmail.com>
To: 'Behcet Sarikaya' <sarikaya@ieee.org>, netext@ietf.org, netlmm@ietf.org
References: <374686.44187.qm@web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:42:26 +0900
Organization: dcn
Message-ID: <003601ca3783$8e1eff40$bf7113ac@dcn0d4b06d5df0>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <374686.44187.qm@web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: Aco3Gj1DKCA2M9iMQ564UrQN+SBjIAAZVQMw
Cc: multimob@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [multimob] [netlmm] Multimob PMIPv6 Multicast Support drafts
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sijeon79@gmail.com
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:42:07 -0000

Hi all,

I'm Seil Jeon, the author of this draft http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-
sijeon-multimob-mms-pmip6-00.txt

Mainly other drafts propose the method using MAG or LMA as multicast router.

However, we can know that there is serious tunnel convergence problem
between MAG and LMA as Mobile IP approach.

And we should consider igmp/mld delay for new joining when mobile if there
are no subscribers.

I think that they are critical factors for PMIPv6 multicast architecture to
be designed and 

the burdens on PMIPv6 components should be minimized as possible.

============================================================================
# Error Notice

As you see handover operation in section 4, PBU/PBA signaling that
exchanging between N-MAG and MR (Multicast Router) is error.

It should be exchanged between N-MAG and LMA. So, don't misunderstand. A MR
is simple multicast router where we have already known.

I would modify an error in (-01) version


Best Regards,

Seil Jeon





-----Original Message-----
From: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netlmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Behcet Sarikaya
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 7:08 AM
To: netext@ietf.org; netlmm@ietf.org
Cc: Stig Venaas; multimob@ietf.org
Subject: [netlmm] Multimob PMIPv6 Multicast Support drafts

Hello all,
  The newly formed Multimob WG has a charter item to publish a document
explaining the use of multicast in PMIPv6. Currently we have these drafts
(in alphabetic order):

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-krishnan-multimob-pmip6basicmcast-solution-
00.txt
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-schmidt-multimob-pmipv6-mcast-deployment-
01.txt
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sijeon-multimob-mms-pmip6-00.txt

and we solicit reviews of these drafts from PMIPv6 people. They are short
and easy to read. 

Please post your review on Multimob list (preferred), or send to the chairs
soon.

Thanks,

Stig & Behcet


      
_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email