Re: [multimob] re Adoption of HO drafts incl. draft-schmidt-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast

"Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> Mon, 06 August 2012 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=558441968=schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CD411E8106 for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lddI1SA9KV8p for <multimob@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de (mx3.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.6.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A16911E8105 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 15:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([141.22.30.74]) by mail3.is.haw-hamburg.de with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 07 Aug 2012 00:03:35 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419E3109E109; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:03:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04240-08; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:03:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.178.36] (e178060050.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.60.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A781D109C90E; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:03:34 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <50203F3F.2070103@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:03:43 -0700
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
References: <CAKcc6Ad1WEhuDXCR0MkW2ycQWuW7Doytg=aDG2_3jYyPk61ZAg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKcc6Ad1WEhuDXCR0MkW2ycQWuW7Doytg=aDG2_3jYyPk61ZAg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.haw-hamburg.de
Cc: multimob@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [multimob] re Adoption of HO drafts incl. draft-schmidt-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multimob>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 22:03:37 -0000

Hi Dapeng Liu,

On 06.08.2012 00:28, liu dapeng wrote:

>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hui-multimob-fast-handover-04
>
>
>
>
> This draft is - if you want so - a competitor to
> draft-schmidt-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast, but has never been
> worked out (as have several other attempts in the past). If this
> document was to be advanced, it had to rewrite (or copy ??) 80 % of
> our draft, which is not a proper way to treat authorship.
>
> ===>
> I aggree draft-hui-multimob-fast-handover-04 is a competitor of
> draft-schmidt-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast.  Further more,
> draft-hui-multimob-fast-handover was written in June 2009 and after
> this draft was submitted for more than half a year, other similar
> draft was submitted and have a lot common idea of our draft. So I
> really do not see why someone say if this document was to be advanced,
> it will need to "COPY" 80% of
> draft-schmidt-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast?
>
> To Behcet:
>
> 1. First of all, may I ask why IETF need more than one solution for
> one problem?
> 2. If the group have decided to allow more than one WG draft forthis
> problem, I then also request the group to consider
> draft-hui-multimob-fast-handover-04 as one basis of WG document.
>

Two answers:

  1. There may be several solutions for different scenarios on the same 
problem scope, as the unicast-people worked out several solutions (i.e., 
MIPSHOP worked out the (P)FMIPv6 handover solution and the transient 
binding in parallel.

  2. draft-hui-multimob-fast-handover-04 has never been worked out. In 
fact, it merely repeats incomplete work that has been around for years, 
the first draft with incomplete sketches on fast handover has been 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-suh-mipshop-fmcast-mip6-00 in 2004!

So the argument we were presenting is: there is reason and need for this 
fast handover solution, and we should adopt the document that is most 
mature, completely worked out and discussed many times in the WG.

Cheers,

Thomas
-- 

Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner Tor 7 °
° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, Germany °
° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet                   Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt    Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 °