[multipathtcp] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-15: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 May 2019 03:53 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6366120091; Wed, 15 May 2019 20:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis@ietf.org, Philip Eardley <philip.eardley@bt.com>, mptcp-chairs@ietf.org, multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.96.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <155797881793.30487.10747272136005026887.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 20:53:37 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/-jUEwTmsGHUyAv-CAFzj-8OEQGY>
Subject: [multipathtcp] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 03:53:38 -0000
Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It’s really nice to have this update; thanks for all the work on it. — Section 8.3 — Initial values for this registry are give in Table 4 Make it “given”. Also, as Specification Required includes appointment of a designated expert, it would help a lot to include some brief guidance to the expert (see RFC 8126).
- [multipathtcp] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draf… Barry Leiba via Datatracker