IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multipathtcp] [Int-area] SOCKS 6 Draft

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Thu, 20 July 2017 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC47F131D15; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oJjf33BqaWX3; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 244D2131D16; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.211] (mul.isi.edu [128.9.160.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v6KHVCYr012125 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: Dragoș Niculescu <dragos.niculescu@cs.pub.ro>
Cc: Vladimir Olteanu <vladimir.olteanu@cs.pub.ro>, multipathtcp <multipathtcp@ietf.org>, int-area <Int-area@ietf.org>
References: <149871247634.6490.5928844232347189122.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c15031f3-95cf-d341-2ddb-0b3850a74d76@isi.edu> <53068639.4279258.1500018250846.JavaMail.zimbra@cs.pub.ro> <0f8dd648-d89f-50ee-716a-7547ee34885a@isi.edu> <f7121225-ce5f-4002-d3cf-202dcdd11f04@cs.pub.ro> <2ff22633-8f12-f4ef-868f-9c6c698ae32f@isi.edu> <5c61bf79-5a8f-65cf-e6b7-02a29db37073@cs.pub.ro> <1cf7caa4-22a2-b61a-662f-8927197baf09@isi.edu> <1332604938.42424.1500535343962.JavaMail.zimbra@cs.pub.ro>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <cb47ca7f-ae21-784e-661a-4c6bc8fbb19a@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:31:12 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1332604938.42424.1500535343962.JavaMail.zimbra@cs.pub.ro>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------96D6D3F36809CF0D970177F4"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/5w68rwmagOdJZidYU1dgWbal4g0>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] [Int-area] SOCKS 6 Draft
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:31:51 -0000


On 7/20/2017 12:22 AM, Dragoș Niculescu wrote:
>> I.e., if you do everything right, you MIGHT end up looking "LIKE" you
>> rewrote the TCP SYN as it "passes through", but speaking of that as the
>> actual mechanism violates TCP.
> It looks like that IF the client has idempotent data, and IF the client uses TFO API, and IF the proxy enables TFO as a client and as a server, and IF the actual server supports TFO. So, there are a lot of IFs to get that kind of performance, but as shown in slide 9 of the presentation [1], it does work with standard API, only twice as slow.  
Agreed, but the text could be much more clear that this is the goal and
expected outcome.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email