Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options?
Mark Handley <M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Thu, 29 July 2010 15:42 UTC
Return-Path: <mark.j.handley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CA228C21B for <multipathtcp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.891
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.891 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fBPOkSCM-13d for <multipathtcp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94C628C201 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxj4 with SMTP id 4so198566yxj.31 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=s9PeRBibni0xYWm94wX5CnlsOqf7Dq9M0iggiCDv85U=; b=Q+JCOXfQKEve0VgJ+HWTFBTDih3/wXOFp8jKqlsrBf3J19OeBX1+J4AtJ489pxP/NS 8ZnCM8QnaQCzBho0VrEiAOHANcxZ930Tw1VyOm883i5boC3EbA/B0Y5y7J1qdVSeqxvJ 0nhCxINnv2TNaB8PPWLDRAUZPfcrPqdAB5nJw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=e0dCglLxOIEILj4Cts2kG+UPpquwQeWTt8BN2oA7TNxn7xhOSJ6jIciIKaRhaDa+44 C8xu5AJIJjrWiFosQ00AoB/rSaiczTZMOOyJXBDzAaraEMy7DGDJZavnpceVp1WoKNEA CJouOPcxuvMNiw1mOqcrE9lkZIDM3uMWUAuPg=
Received: by 10.150.75.12 with SMTP id x12mr1366026yba.103.1280418169574; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mark.j.handley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.203.138 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <282447E9-0047-4F6C-8B6E-09301F72A930@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <282447E9-0047-4F6C-8B6E-09301F72A930@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
From: Mark Handley <M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:42:29 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -EIwoQtKCPxXXHN294q8o6c08K4
Message-ID: <AANLkTins-c9nTPzKkeAJsv+WHwcd_dGUwL7WwRgaXY9+@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexander Zimmermann <alexander.zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: multipathtcp <multipathtcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options?
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multipathtcp>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:42:27 -0000
I've also been wondering about the "extended option" option. For example: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kohler-tcpm-extopt-00 It seems like it might be good to define this now, even though we know we can't effectively use it for a long time (many years at least). The issue is of course middleboxes that might not understand, and parse extended options as payload. But as a long-term exercise, it does seem like the right thing to do. - Mark On 29 July 2010 16:19, Alexander Zimmermann <alexander.zimmermann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > Hi, > > since we decided today to put the signaling stuff into the > options (good decision), I wonder if it's the right time now > to extend the option field. > > Remember, Linux for example use Timestamps and SACK per > default, so that no space is free (without loosing SACK > blocks)... > > Alex > > > // > // Dipl.-Inform. Alexander Zimmermann > // Department of Computer Science, Informatik 4 > // RWTH Aachen University > // Ahornstr. 55, 52056 Aachen, Germany > // phone: (49-241) 80-21422, fax: (49-241) 80-22220 > // email: zimmermann@cs.rwth-aachen.de > // web: http://www.umic-mesh.net > // > > > _______________________________________________ > multipathtcp mailing list > multipathtcp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp > >
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Michio Honda
- [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Fred Baker
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Randall Stewart
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Mark Handley
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? SCHARF, Michael
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Costin Raiciu
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Joe Touch
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Andreas Ripke
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Joe Touch
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Ilpo Järvinen
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Robert Watson
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Andreas Ripke
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Andreas Ripke
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Joe Touch
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? L.Wood
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Olivier Bonaventure
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Arnd Hannemann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Joe Touch
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? L.Wood
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Joe Touch
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Joe Touch
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Joe Touch
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Andreas Ripke
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Joe Touch
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Arnd Hannemann
- Re: [multipathtcp] Time for Long Options? Costin Raiciu