Re: [multipathtcp] New Version Notification for draft-mglt-mif-security-requirements-02.txt

[Daniel Migault <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

We will be presenting MIF security requirements for IPsec at the mif
meeting at 1pm. If you have free time, we would appreciate you come and
participate in the discussion.

BR,
Daniel

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Daniel Migault <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Please find the new version of IPsec security requirements with Multiple
> Interfaces.
>
> Comments and suggestions are welcome
>
> BR
>
> Daniel
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <[e-mail]>
> Date: Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:50 AM
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-mglt-mif-security-requirements-02.txt
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-mglt-mif-security-requirements-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Daniel Migault and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Filename:        draft-mglt-mif-security-requirements
> Revision:        02
> Title:           IPsec Multiple Interfaces Requirements
> Creation date:   2012-07-30
> WG ID:           Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 16
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mglt-mif-security-requirements-02.txt
> Status:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-mif-security-requirements
> Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mglt-mif-security-requirements-02
> Diff:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mglt-mif-security-requirements-02
>
> Abstract:
>    Multiple Interface Nodes (MIF Nodes) may use their Multiple
>    Interfaces to perform Mobility, Multihoming.  Then, these MIF Nodes
>    may also manage traffic between these Multiple Interfaces.  Because
>    IPsec has not been designed for Multiple Interfaces, MIF Nodes have
>    difficulties to benefit from MIF features with IPsec protected
>    communications.
>
>    This document provides use cases where IPsec protected communications
>    would take advantage of MIF features.  From these uses cases, we
>    identify the different IPsec features MIF Nodes would require.  Then,
>    we expose the limitations of the IPsec related protocols IKEv2 and
>    MOBIKE regarding to these MIF features before listing the MIF IPsec
>    Security Requirements that should be address by a extension of IKEv2
>    or MOBIKE.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Migault
> Orange Labs -- Security
> [phone]
>



-- 
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
[phone]