Re: [multipathtcp] Towards a Multipath TCP Proxy work item

Olivier Bonaventure <> Mon, 14 November 2016 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8AC129420 for <>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:36:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dk7e3JUrErpL for <>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:36:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B97C129415 for <>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:36:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9D8F67DA14; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:36:17 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 B9D8F67DA14
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=selucl; t=1479108977; bh=2WNJRR6Xf3p7aInLIW0TznQTCwFnqDQHMj67OaPBQNA=; h=Reply-To:Subject:References:To:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LICNugX0GbVr9IvVuMYQflwHlZbc4cjG+WTgGXndGgOvR0b//G/EyIm8EKAWndxPQ uvZ/jO9HzvS9WZUUh5lq0Wf+vYqCkvvBNLcp+Pau/Oi1xLtIz/HWCU1EfxmPXPTh8C ingRIHg7fCPKhMgTceYDRkELdotsaIOwI6g5cmfM=
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at smtp-3
References: <> <> <>
From: Olivier Bonaventure <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:36:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sgsi-Spamcheck: SASL authenticated,
X-SGSI-MailScanner-ID: B9D8F67DA14.A7081
X-SGSI-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-SGSI-Spam-Status: No
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Towards a Multipath TCP Proxy work item
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 07:36:26 -0000


> i think we should move beyond "exploring whether it would be useful".
> i'd like us to assess proposed solutions. i think we should say this is
> what we're doing - at the moment we've had quite a lot of discussion
> about one proposal. we should give the chance for other proposals,
> and make the discussion more structured (what are the assessment
> criteria).

Totally agree. Let's ask for proposals described in drafts at the next 
IETF meeting and decide based on detailed documents and not based on a 
few sentences exchanged by email. Details matter