Re: [multipathtcp] Collection of MPTCP proxy scenarios.

Lukasz Budzisz <lukasz.budzisz@tu-berlin.de> Mon, 27 April 2015 08:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lukasz.budzisz@tu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58AF1B2EF8 for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 01:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.859
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.859 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iFtRe9uG-wT4 for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 01:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tu-berlin.de (mail.tu-berlin.de [130.149.7.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE041B2EF3 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 01:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-tubIT-Incoming-IP: 130.149.49.51
Received: from vpnsrv.tkn.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.49.51] helo=[192.168.103.163]) by mail.tu-berlin.de (exim-4.76/mailfrontend-7) with esmtpsa [UNKNOWN:AES128-SHA:128] for <multipathtcp@ietf.org> id 1YmeKY-0005mH-1Z; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:23:55 +0200
Message-ID: <553DF21A.20906@tu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:23:54 +0200
From: Lukasz Budzisz <lukasz.budzisz@tu-berlin.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: multipathtcp@ietf.org
References: <C5C3BB522B1DDF478AA09545169155B46E336D13@nkgeml507-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C5C3BB522B1DDF478AA09545169155B46E336D13@nkgeml507-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060902000201060803070101"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/co_tgY5ZxNT_-sFxCrF6M13C-NA>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Collection of MPTCP proxy scenarios.
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:24:00 -0000

Dear Xinpeng,
you may have a look at the draft we presented in the IETF Paris meeting:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ayar-transparent-sca-proxy-00
Best regards,
Lukasz

On 27/04/15 10:20, Weixinpeng (Jackie) wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> MPTCP proxy aims to provide additional deployment support for MPTCP 
> protocol, and the functions provided
>
> by MPTCP proxy could involve several different aspects such as 
> supporting establishment of MPTCP connection between
>
> MPTCP host and traditional TCP host, aggregating of subflows to one 
> point for security reasons,…
>
> I am trying to figure out as many MPTCP proxy deployment scenarios as 
> possible to have a more deep understanding
>
> of how MPTCP proxy should work. As an example, here are some potential 
> scenarios:
>
> (1) MPTCP proxy in operator’s network. The operator could deploy MPTCP 
> proxy to assist MPTCP-capable UE to communicate
>
> with TCP server on Internet using MPTCP.
>
> (2) MPTCP proxy in enterprise network. Enterprise network could ask 
> all the traffic pass through security check point for security reasons,
>
> in this case, all the subflows belong to a MPTCP connection should be 
> aggregated at the same point.
>
> Besides, some existing documents such as draft-deng-mptcp-proxy-01 and 
> draft-lopez-mptcp-middlebox-00 also provide some related discussion.
>
> So if you know some additional MPTCP proxy deployment scenarios 
> especially the ones that have some special requirements, It will be 
> appreciated if you could
>
> share it here. Or if you have any other considerations on the MPTCP 
> proxy topic, we can also discuss it here.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> -Xinpeng
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multipathtcp mailing list
> multipathtcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp