[multipathtcp] Review of RFC6824bis - Multipath TCP
<philip.eardley@bt.com> Wed, 18 July 2018 15:59 UTC
Return-Path: <philip.eardley@bt.com>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18919130E39 for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I_m1mwMJRMp6 for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpb1.bt.com (smtpb1.bt.com [62.7.242.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE62B130DFE for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net (10.55.202.22) by EVMED02-UKBR.bt.com (10.216.161.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:58:59 +0100
Received: from rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net (10.55.202.22) by rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net (10.55.202.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:59:02 +0100
Received: from rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net ([fe80::d514:fe50:560c:401e]) by rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net ([fe80::d514:fe50:560c:401e%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1293.004; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:59:02 +0100
From: philip.eardley@bt.com
To: x.defoy.ietf@gmail.com, rahul.ietf@gmail.com
CC: nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp, multipathtcp@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: Review of RFC6824bis - Multipath TCP
Thread-Index: AdQerxiJ3zmxcKJgQ8Kus8ghK021hA==
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:59:01 +0000
Message-ID: <bdcb304e18274eadbfa22013c7a23883@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.216.161.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_bdcb304e18274eadbfa22013c7a23883rew09926dag03bdomain1sy_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/tKtiAbyWJ3UgwR36MEcKaSJeR70>
Subject: [multipathtcp] Review of RFC6824bis - Multipath TCP
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 15:59:09 -0000
Xavier, Rahul, Thank-you very much for agreeing to review the document, it is much appreciated. (Rahul - I hope I got the right email address) The right document to review is https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis (-11) Please send comments to the mailing list multipathtcp@ietf.org<mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org> (Don't worry about repeating issues that have already been raised. If you're interested in tracking Christoph's working copy as the issues raised so far are fixed, https://github.com/multipath-tcp/draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis/pull/6. And https://github.com/multipath-tcp/draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis/issues) Thank-you! Phil & Yoshi -- -----Original Message----- From: multipathtcp [mailto:multipathtcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of philip.eardley@bt.com<mailto:philip.eardley@bt.com> Sent: 26 June 2018 03:33 To: multipathtcp@ietf.org<mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis Hi, Just a reminder about the WGLC for the protocol bis. Please send comments, Thanks! Phil & Yoshi -----Original Message----- From: multipathtcp [mailto:multipathtcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of philip.eardley@bt.com<mailto:philip.eardley@bt.com> Sent: 05 June 2018 12:21 To: multipathtcp@ietf.org<mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis As a reminder, this document Obsoletes: 6824 (if approved) and its Intended status is Standards Track. As well as suggested changes or edits, positive review comments ("It's ready") are also very valuable. -----Original Message----- From: multipathtcp [mailto:multipathtcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of philip.eardley@bt.com<mailto:philip.eardley@bt.com> Sent: 05 June 2018 09:14 To: multipathtcp@ietf.org<mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org> Subject: [multipathtcp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis This starts a WG Last Call for draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis. Please send comments by the end of June. Please note there are three IPR disclosures (we're working on getting them added to the rfc6824bis page): * two are inherited from RFC6824 https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-mptcp-multiaddressed * one is inherited from draft-paasch-mptcp-syncookies (which got include in rfc6824bis) https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2678/ Thanks, Phil & Yoshi _______________________________________________ multipathtcp mailing list multipathtcp@ietf.org<mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp _______________________________________________ multipathtcp mailing list multipathtcp@ietf.org<mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp _______________________________________________ multipathtcp mailing list multipathtcp@ietf.org<mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp
- [multipathtcp] Review of RFC6824bis - Multipath T… philip.eardley
- Re: [multipathtcp] Review of RFC6824bis - Multipa… Rahul Jadhav