IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-00.txt

Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br> Wed, 28 March 2012 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9BD21F8A19; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1332931476; bh=DcGq4riXag9LKAI/kDi4INbF5f5OP838KSHz5Z6zTgE=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=L9CLw/p4ZxEbY8zy8ERSi9fwWrWjiQqWHeWTKwkPiqwz2t6k9gTX+uIDcejKLRw5u a3FfNuYOwIb40OwK8UgudcFGtgNMhrvix1c8LzN3uLo14ewuDdHl9+kTuPZnAJQaMy b2MVi0Y7p/PsQjknjqZHoDrr8rvndHmUoeljyfWA=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A693721F8A2B for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8MCagyZyEHEu for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clone.registro.br (clone.registro.br [IPv6:2001:12ff:0:2::4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2008321F8A16 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by clone.registro.br (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 767D7E044E; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:44:33 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:44:33 -0300
From: Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120328104433.GD26343@registro.br>
References: <20120327084731.30282.35216.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1203272004400.25094@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1203272004400.25094@fledge.watson.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 08:12:17PM -0400, Samuel Weiler wrote:
> As I said at the microphone in Paris, I would strongly prefer to see 
> typecode templates posted publicly in all cases.  I see no need to 
> shorten the review period beyond the current three weeks.

I agree with that and for the purpose of not depending on a dying
working group mailing list, I would suggest the creation of an
specific public list for this registry.

IANA or the acting experts on the past allocations could post the old
templates and the registry could simply reference this list archive as
a way to maintain the history of this allocations.

Fred
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email