IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] NSEC4

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 04 January 2012 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4820721F8679; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:59:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1325678345; bh=YDKoPm/a6bSlnl3/DeE3Tty3EvgTitQeSPdBgf2Q1qQ=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=QmtAbFqPhwaMsSGTqcqsc9euqdAZLzKZY5sWY6sxV5k1U5IgZlCEW0UTVuFtYgZ3x jLgEpAFEodOAJSM4cXMij2Zblhed9McLZrCnA5BY5X4ndsqVc8NU4knX83zR2gR0QC TZfmJ+m93hJ4PmQIDOjkCD8F7sjaomVn672Utt7I=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C01221F8682 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:59:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0OziBXFH6pXS for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:59:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B721421F864E for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 03:58:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shinkuro.com (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8604B1ECB41C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:58:54 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 06:58:51 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120104115851.GD21112@shinkuro.com>
References: <20120104092946.GA4199@miek.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120104092946.GA4199@miek.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] NSEC4
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:29:46AM +0100, Miek Gieben wrote:
> Our question is what is the best place to archive this? Re-reading RFC 2026,
> we are considering to put this on the experimental non-standards track.

Given that it's an experiment, that seems like a reasonable thing to
do, unless you think the experiment is over.  In the latter case, just
write an informational document and be done with it.

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email