Re: draft-eastlake-2606bis-00.txt: Suggestion for removal
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 04 November 2005 08:34 UTC
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Subject: Re: draft-eastlake-2606bis-00.txt: Suggestion for removal
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:34:54 +0100
Organization: NIC France
Lines: 23
References: <EEB12E1E457C2C4889480994@[192.168.100.25]> <200511031637.jA3Gbl0C006036@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org Fri Nov 04 09:45:47 2005
Return-path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200511031637.jA3Gbl0C006036@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 i686
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mx2.nic.fr
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418072104.2560.86012.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:37:47AM -0500, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> wrote a message of 160 lines which said: > IMO, we should not at all. At best, include a pointer to ICANN and > say "their turf". Not even that, IMHO. THere is no reason for the IETF to endorse ICANN or to imply that it has a role here. > what is the problem with 2606 that needs fixing/updating? Nobody documentd that. > Do we actually need an updated to 2606? No. -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- Re: draft-eastlake-2606bis-00.txt: Suggestion for… Stephane Bortzmeyer