Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-01.txt
Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com> Mon, 02 April 2012 13:45 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D25921F849D; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 06:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333374345; bh=p3bsPMH1reNUynzGGVLFJNsUoPLUF7KB/4bdCs3Ioro=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:Message-Id:From:Date:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Sender; b=xVvcYSPpZx0FNU+tkuVfsXOvqJY5a4BQV6PbT61rIWmVh3bqwNzDD04BigWZrrkdy omswerU4enmkpc1OvWTuRxpRLBpygDe/nVamkv8mEI6NOSD3jCZwjTRvkq87kIwZBW A9h4tY/gW2YEApeg6K7XirZHn/TaV5xFCTBt4cfQ=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D5021F849D for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 06:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sZEuzEZ6D0B6 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 06:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com (mail-qa0-f42.google.com [209.85.216.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE8B21F849C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 06:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qafi31 with SMTP id i31so2126786qaf.15 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 06:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=D2AJQrhwoYUT153hz4Do1JbezX7UdO9Vk0pCONTz8TI=; b=HatrIkPjVXY/HGKXqc2GrKGB5muLuBb1NAJKLOfuwX5lKzNqq0fG12ya0zF3TYUkSq uYHyNcAYf+KycWC9IOfK4TiesPU2yPf7s698ivJx1DnEokBWqTAm9lqWrDBDotUOH5uN TtWAuy4rr7ZZFIXkbyHdg+L4vqKel4XHA+yegtejKI+U5aWaJUp60LJ3J0UuFhwQpQ53 0Ts+GqiXsyUOMnH5VC/bCaRbL5SWeRASABwWAczCzuycnVyAiryyJVypnadcjHOx2I9d E473TAdm/jXahuriK3nixO1GDIcEjxw490djPWO3yn01Bj8PQ++2CUdP9Wtqw4i2jKdY Q46w==
Received: by 10.229.77.131 with SMTP id g3mr3259981qck.147.1333374336256; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 06:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.195.159] (mobile-198-228-192-126.mycingular.net. [198.228.192.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w9sm34689749qao.0.2012.04.02.06.45.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 06:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20120326142607.26742.59731.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8CC420BD-C5B6-4444-AC48-A0D127DE7B83@gmail.com> <E9B97EAE-2820-43C8-AA68-2AB32C748955@vpnc.org> <CAKW6Ri6Vr8UYwrOnT5Wr-JYeVvqRVw5=bGEAFtnBfNNeuyO4Ag@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKW6Ri6Vr8UYwrOnT5Wr-JYeVvqRVw5=bGEAFtnBfNNeuyO4Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <466E866A-DC61-4368-8437-02473389122B@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B179)
From: Scott Rose <scottr.nist@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:45:28 -0400
To: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, DNSEXT Working Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4062666090723169204=="
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
I think it's clunky too and may not be accurate. Some algorithm may be "obsolete" for DNSSEC but not for other uses. I will tweak it in the revision. Sent via a series of tubes. On Apr 2, 2012, at 9:37 AM, Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> wrote: > > On 2 April 2012 02:11, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote: > "obsolescing" makes me gag hard enough to call it a problem, not a nit. > > > Ugly; but apparently not obsolete, according to my English (EN-GB) dictionary! > > obsolesce verb (obsolesced, obsolescing) > intr to become obsolete; to be going out of use. 19c. > > Chambers 21st Century Dictionary
_______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg… internet-drafts
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Scott Rose
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Dick Franks
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Scott Rose
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Samuel Weiler