[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode-00.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 12 January 2012 00:00 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8475011E80BB; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:00:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1326326405; bh=kAEjRCMx+CojMuovi5gt8O+3HL/CjKVq8npmq4zmQ3Q=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Message-ID:Date:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=ic7LfiwFXLMNvMuratwezysQG/6Bd1apFtZmTUWiGdTTuarRurb+hYl6lgoEhSpba UREv+x4H8oDu9bWotuVYDgFjVFoV/17C01EJuONBJC0/i3RbhZZL7Px0YEFF6frtuA tNBoh+HOeDrv/LgREEyvgutlZZCndg5yHCLw3TCo=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E1811E809F; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:00:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uE9ebaf8RFkN; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:00:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7FF21F84DE; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:00:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64p1
Message-ID: <20120112000002.18893.22420.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:00:02 -0800
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the DNS Extensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : xNAME RCODE and Status Bits Clarification Author(s) : Donald E. Eastlake 3rd Filename : draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode-00.txt Pages : 9 Date : 2012-01-11 The Domain Name System (DNS) has long provided means, such as CNAME (Canonical Name), where a query can be redirected to a different name. A DNS response header has an RCODE (Response Code) field, used for indicating errors, and response status bits. This document clarifies, in the case of such redirected queries, how the RCODE and status bits correspond to the initial query cycle (where the CNAME or the like was detected) and subsequent or final query cycles. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode-00.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode-00.txt _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode… internet-drafts