Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft

[Thierry Moreau <[e-mail]>]

Paul Vixie wrote:

> # > [...]  [T]he TAKREM author can do a SCO or R.I.M. style attack against
> # > anyone who successfully monetizes the result (that is, claiming that ALL
> # > possible ways to solve this problem are covered under the TAKREM patent)
> # > [...].
> # 
> # This is completely ridiculous! Please record my disagreement.
> 
> so noted, for whatever that's worth.
> 
> perhaps you can help, out of the spirit of professionalism, to steer this
> WG toward solutions that do not infringe?

So I'm a SCO-raider on one post, then a messianic professional WG 
steersman on the next!

> i'm thinking that you could send
> out a patent number, page, and paragraph number any time you think a proposal
> here would ultimately lead the eventual holder of your IPR to come knocking?

More seriously, in good faith, I abide by the disclosure rules in RFC3979.

The documents for which an IPR disclosure has been made in relation to 
TAKREM are
   1) draft-moreau-dnsext-takrem-dns
   2) draft-moreau-pkix-takrem

That's it.

-- 

- Thierry Moreau

CONNOTECH Experts-conseils inc.
9130 Place de Montgolfier
Montreal, Qc
Canada   H2M 2A1

Tel.: [phone]
Fax:  [phone]

web site: http://www.connotech.com
e-mail: [e-mail]


--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>