Re: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-01.txt

Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> Tue, 27 March 2012 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0303F21F898C; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1332849111; bh=GD5kv/Ri3RrSlxh/T1tGYXaHHfIuz6fSsU0Om781sOk=; h=From:To:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Content-ID: MIME-Version:Cc:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=jLiVjmlrpfFpGnjzO57RoTI4mRrK55Arj+o4PEHBG/jkU6D6oGuinEl1PWeM6Sd1p ydKRbVUqqEjXT9LSJITWK/5ELS5+SbLQw8CRW5iql5FSJjlTU7tIcp2BnAuqhu6M/7 MvMA1OvWsWS9SHGae6ZJTgX+zp0RrmXjd5NR6ctU=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC4721E809C for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TD8spLX9jYqq for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.nominet.org.uk (mx3.nominet.org.uk [213.248.199.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79EB21F898B for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 04:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:CC:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=XBpNq+PUM9ELBTtGJ30OtJaiq7OegteudybpKTNAsx5TLsRamyZCV6yb r/obn04tzBDKiJk5ra5ToGRX2i2q1Fai+/Go6V/wRy/5yp+TLOnGAvy3x eQ1HhaE9CUPQCtD;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1332849107; x=1364385107; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Ray=20Bellis=20<Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> |Subject:=20Re:=20[dnsext]=20Fwd:=20New=20Version=20Notif ication=20for=0D=0A=20draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-01 .txt|Date:=20Tue,=2027=20Mar=202012=2011:51:47=20+0000 |Message-ID:=20<AB0D3E1A-EA95-4096-A501-FCCE6AEDFE61@nomi net.org.uk>|To:=20Dick=20Franks=20<rwfranks@acm.org>|CC: =20DNSEXT=20Working=20Group=20<dnsext@ietf.org> |MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|Content-ID:=20<8ebdd17b-82fe-4270-af85-4078e647 447e>|In-Reply-To:=20<CAKW6Ri76oOasGLKEe6kD05D8rybz0cDZX8 wyRiqWGStq-kvk6g@mail.gmail.com>|References:=20<201203270 82614.22953.96097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>=0D=0A=20<DD6C 7261-806F-4F33-8CF3-D9A16FBD4B8C@nominet.org.uk>=0D=0A=20 <CAKW6Ri76oOasGLKEe6kD05D8rybz0cDZX8wyRiqWGStq-kvk6g@mail .gmail.com>; bh=BAWqAha2o1CatQJOnlBx/4vvAnKO/R9JFxC0kumytTk=; b=NUw5PEvsGTkxqoXrJ2WkeTNXBgeGz9o96Lx26AG5f4KHh5P6O1jqhQBr 3i3Onl4nNIqSYbaz+Y9eJaUYmOEY52JQZJJky5oEmZ2/zWaG1rvS9OtGo WDnV8IbT0Zh6cZs;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,325,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="39349772"
Received: from wds-exc1.okna.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.144]) by mx3.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2012 12:51:46 +0100
Received: from WDS-EXC2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::7577:eaca:5241:25d4]) by wds-exc1.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::1593:1394:a91f:8f5f%19]) with mapi; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:51:46 +0100
From: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
To: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNDAzec1LrRGUoBUOhT/oyBZ3oR5Z99xyA
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:51:47 +0000
Message-ID: <AB0D3E1A-EA95-4096-A501-FCCE6AEDFE61@nominet.org.uk>
References: <20120327082614.22953.96097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DD6C7261-806F-4F33-8CF3-D9A16FBD4B8C@nominet.org.uk> <CAKW6Ri76oOasGLKEe6kD05D8rybz0cDZX8wyRiqWGStq-kvk6g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKW6Ri76oOasGLKEe6kD05D8rybz0cDZX8wyRiqWGStq-kvk6g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-ID: <8ebdd17b-82fe-4270-af85-4078e647447e>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: DNSEXT Working Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On 27 Mar 2012, at 13:29, Dick Franks wrote:

> Ray,
> 
> IMHO data format is horribly overcomplicated.
> 
> 
> [3.1] redundant OPTION-DATA content
> Redundant: packet direction determined by QR flag in packet header.

Not at all, per the text the intention of the QTD bit is to distinguish between a server which correctly parsed the option, and one that simply echoed it.
 
>    QTCOUNT: a 3 bit field with range 0 .. 7 specifying the number of QT
>    fields to follow.
> Redundant: easily calculated from OPTION-LENGTH.

That may be fair - it's a year since I wrote the draft so I need to recall what the rationale was for not relying on the OPTION LENGTH.

kind regards,

Ray

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext