Re: Standardize RSA/SHA256 ?

[Jelte Jansen <[e-mail]>]

> 
>> For the above reasons, I think that we have time to consider the
>> correct course of action. There is no need to rush into more
>> algorithms which require more code on nameservers and resolvers.
> 
> Yes, or at least, we need to document a more compelling reason to do
> RSA-SHA-265.
> 

So why is this an issue for RSA/SHA256, and not for
draft-ietf-dnsext-ds-sha256-05.txt, which also makes SHA256 mandatory?

btw, both drafts don't deprecate SHA-1 but do assume that SHA256 is
stronger and contain text about downgrade attacks based on this assumption.

Jelte