Re: [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ?
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 30 May 2012 12:27 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E5621F86E2; Wed, 30 May 2012 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1338380858; bh=8WALdM0zBAjQMNKAqGqFA1myoKTGJvOn9fv5yflvL1Q=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-reply-to:Date:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=K8Wi6WA7A1JwluQRqBsaD64nK6grHnFVGgNibi4MwJnZWX8KZHVtu05zVZ6p+xcyL RsgYAhGC5Ygio0pCTnlE2OisT7pJHHE17FScWJlxcJAumP9v+/pqx5BszoLvai5zuY W3NOrKAJAl1jvaihA470fAacwKWMrKZ1PWSxdQk4=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0E221F86E2 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 05:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JR9l6DmzNRE9 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 05:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFFB21F86DE for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 05:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4UCQvSn038306; Wed, 30 May 2012 14:26:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201205301226.q4UCQvSn038306@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: Marc Lampo <marc.lampo@eurid.eu>
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 30 May 2012 13:31:03 +0200. <004d01cd3e57$b230ec80$1692c580$@lampo@eurid.eu>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:26:57 +0200
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
There is an order between sections but no order inside a section. BTW DNSSEC RRs can go in a different section than the RRsets they protect. Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ? Marc Lampo
- Re: [dnsext] rfc4035 & 5155 : order of RR's ? Francis Dupont