Re: [dnsext] What to do with BNAME

On 01/19/2012 22:29, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> There's been a suggestion that BNAME be adopted by the WG and
> standardized within this WG. 

I'd also like to get my CLONE draft published, one way or another. :)

> At the same time, we have been asked by
> our Area Director to be ready to wind up the WG by the spring.
> 
> We are not sure that these goals are consistent with one another, and
> are therefore reluctant to add the draft to the WG's commitments.  But
> there is an alternative.  Those who are interested in pursuing this
> work could request a BOF session to investigate just this proposal, or
> aliasing more generally in the DNS.  There is still time to prepare
> such a request: the cutoff date for BOFs is 2012-02-16.

I'm definitely interested, but can't attend in person.

> We look towards those who are the strongest proponents of this to
> organize such a BOF; we are both ready to help with the organization
> in regards to the IETF mechanics.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Andrew and Olafur
> 

-- 

	It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext