Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-06
Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Fri, 04 May 2012 18:48 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F8221F8557; Fri, 4 May 2012 11:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1336157296; bh=QEa1dXqvKnzzgeCKRUFF4yXos7uX0MtMV8Ks1d+Y6Bg=; h=From:Message-Id:To:Date:Mime-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=koPknT4ycPkXfUIVRRsg9y9pNcg9CDuRHjMCxsO5CzRCsdUpCPz8s+oMJSgQo5IjP luHgKKn2iYFoPxbwrYhlIRdzrwtCmAsnd1c0dwEBnzD7wPRM+rsvDBGIbetZn5Hqyi bpoGr5E3l7WoaCMimwGePychPH+VYK4r4qjwwfIo=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BE421F8555 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 11:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.259
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.259 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.490, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Lp9yVgF4Y1H for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 11:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECFA21F8557 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 11:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3.2) id AA190197213; Fri, 4 May 2012 20:46:53 +0200
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id UAA07933; Fri, 4 May 2012 20:46:51 +0200 (MESZ)
From: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Message-Id: <201205041846.UAA07933@TR-Sys.de>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 20:46:51 +0200
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-06
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
With the exception of the minor oversight of repeated occurrences of a single textual flaw pointed out in my WGLC comments, I am satisfied with the revised draft version (-06). Applying the change from "cryptographic and hash algorithms" (or similar) to "digital signature and hash algorithms" twice more (in the Abstract and in Section 8) should not need another draft iteration now -- that can easily be fixed later. So IMHO, the draft now should be ready for publication request to the IESG. Best regards, Alfred. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Steve Crocker
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Matthijs Mekking