Re: [dnsext] Short introduction to zone cuts?

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Mon, 19 March 2012 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBE521F8691; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1332198805; bh=ng831N/xqOfFVgEzFPqJ7RWOZGLvfkDYu84Dii5DQns=; h=To:From:References:In-reply-to:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=lCazTLSuh4DB32ZG5J5v4icXNvKCIFZujWYQVO7Cf/c2K38GPP1y3jW2mdyQZ0lRB 6h5YefWGel5q7cz35lEywwjfQoy6vvBQo1h7erjdezf1kmncTIRTJ0BDwB3bxEsVGC kSoTCYpWGuW0IDVvHf3rxw/QI9e1GW8d94n1ddsY=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85E921F8691 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xVtHfDJM6vv for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327A021F8690 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADF91C9422; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:645b:31fe:90c7:4d73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 717E7216C31; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0501EAD8EC; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:13:01 +1100 (EST)
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <946E9EC4-9872-4A98-BCEB-3CD7420929A1@vpnc.org> <20120316233618.16C831E9F8E3@drugs.dv.isc.org> <8D53F412-A917-4DB2-9B7F-527B8FDD6779@nominet.org.uk>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:31:40 -0000." <8D53F412-A917-4DB2-9B7F-527B8FDD6779@nominet.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:13:00 +1100
Message-Id: <20120319231301.2D0501EAD8EC@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, DNSEXT Working Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Short introduction to zone cuts?
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

In message <8D53F412-A917-4DB2-9B7F-527B8FDD6779@nominet.org.uk>, Ray Bellis wr
ites:
> 
> On 16 Mar 2012, at 23:36, Mark Andrews wrote:
> 
> > RFC 1034 say all you need to say for zone operators about NS record.
> 
> IMHO, there's more to it than that.
> 
> For example, if you have this in a parent zone:
> 
> 1.1.1.1.5.5.5.3.0.2.1.e164.arpa. IN NS ns1.example.com
> 
> and this in the child zone:
> 
> $ORIGIN 5.5.5.3.0.2.1.e164.arpa.
> @          SOA ...
> @          NS ns1.example.com
> 0.0.0.0    NAPTR ...
> 1.0.0.0    NAPTR ...
> 
> it currently works - the parent zone points to the right server, but the pa=
> rent and child disagree on where the zone cut is.
> 
> However with DNSSEC that is no longer possible.  There's nowhere to put the=
>  DS record.
> 
> For various historic reasons, the UK public ENUM tree has per-number NS rec=
> ords as shown above.  To make the parent and child consistent (without chan=
> ging the parent) the child server would need to have a separate zone file _=
> per number_.

No.  It needs the data to be available.  With traditional servers
this has required a zone file.  But even with named this could come
from a single database that defines the zones and their content using
DLZ.

dbjdns does this with a single flat file.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext