Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE request: template for ZS record]
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com Sat, 22 November 2008 14:45 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2A13A6872; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:45:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XA4UPK+aHYaD; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961BA3A6843; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1L3tfr-000MOw-KR for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:41:27 +0000
Received: from [2001:478:6:0:230:48ff:fe11:220a] (helo=vacation.karoshi.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <bmanning@karoshi.com>) id 1L3tfl-000MJX-DC for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:41:24 +0000
Received: from karoshi.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id mAMEbE2i010849; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:37:14 GMT
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id mAMEbDtG010848; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:37:13 GMT
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:37:13 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
Cc: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE request: template for ZS record]
Message-ID: <20081122143713.GA10816@vacation.karoshi.com.>
References: <20081121190348.GB20868@shinkuro.com> <D7045FFF-1746-4ADD-AF56-0B876E031D51@NLnetLabs.nl> <BB2EC28B-178B-4DA8-9C14-31ED75BE2C07@rfc1035.com> <09A5C945-E769-4763-92BC-2A9032FE5502@nlnetlabs.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <09A5C945-E769-4763-92BC-2A9032FE5502@nlnetlabs.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 07:26:12AM -0600, Olaf Kolkman wrote: > > > More to draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis than to your request. I think that > if a specification assumes knowledge of administrative boundaries in > the domain namespace than that is an argument to deny the code point. > > --Olaf perhaps a (-1) is useful here. there are two points in the namespace graph that assume some knowledge of the administrative boundaries... the root and the leaf. if this WKS look-alike emerges -AND- is used in the RRset of a leaf, then it is reasonable to assume certain adminstrative bounds and no real good reason to deny the code point. if someone uses this elsewhere in the graph, then it has no meaning. --bill -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Otmar Lendl
- [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS record Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Kevin Darcy
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… bmanning
- [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE requ… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE … Patrik Fältström
- Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE … Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE … bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] 2929bis DNS assumptions [was RRTYPE … Peter Koch
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… bert hubert
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Peter Koch
- [dnsext] whois vs. Re:...template for ZS record Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: template for ZS reco… Ted Hardie
- RRTYPE love, was Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request: tem… Shane Kerr
- Re: RRTYPE love, was Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request:… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: RRTYPE love, was Re: [dnsext] RRTYPE request:… Ted Hardie