Re: in-addr.arpa
Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> Mon, 11 November 2002 10:03 UTC
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Subject: Re: in-addr.arpa
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:03:32 +1100
Lines: 32
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
References: <E18AvRv-0004lS-00@libra.cus.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Mohammad Awad <maa1074@hotmail.com>
Return-path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <E18AvRv-0004lS-00@libra.cus.cam.ac.uk>
Precedence: bulk
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418071644.2560.56873.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:00:39 +0000 (GMT) From: Chris Thompson <cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk> Message-ID: <E18AvRv-0004lS-00@libra.cus.cam.ac.uk> | > that aside, operationally, from the normal uses of the in-addr.arpa | > zone, at least SOA, NS, KEY, DS, SIG, and PTR would be expected. | > and i have probably forgotten some. | | CNAMEs, to implement classless delegation a la RFC 2317 ? TXT is common as well, and RP should be there, and A records for rfc1101 if anyone still does that. Of course, also AXFR and IXFR. But the real answer was in the first part of Randy's mail - any RR at all, so see 1034, 1035, and all that has followed. in-addr.arpa domains are no different than any others, except as relates to the expected frequency of RR's sought there. This all assumes that "types of queries" means "types of RR's that might be queried", if read literally though, there's only one type of query that exists in the DNS (opcode 0) now that IQUERY has been discarded (finally) so that's the one and only query type that you should be seeing. The server can also get NOTIFY and UPDATE packets, but they don't really count as queries. kre -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- Re: in-addr.arpa Randy Bush
- in-addr.arpa Mohammad Awad
- Re: in-addr.arpa Randy Bush
- Re: in-addr.arpa Chris Thompson
- Re: in-addr.arpa Robert Elz
- Re: in-addr.arpa Robert Elz