[dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-03.txt> (DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry Updates) to Proposed Standard

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 27 June 2012 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC95521F875D; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1340805187; bh=d5Zt7AcpiE5u7OBpsiu6TWdAHp/vqHjcYEr9hJr7zuE=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Message-ID:Date:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=POffyDAgA6b3Qv5znVyQXBIsiQwgnHs05UXEP+X3AhS18NIkTmlW+Wi0gnKgzCkLm TEZN14OfmdlxPsCGIGlZ2PirPCuATgKToDl7L0T52JvC6N+LzMBsirqbqUfRk+YyZK fdp0L9eVcnFNczd2ReZeGpZfxLruWKSsov3SyIWI=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89B221F8754; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9TZNF-VUgTO1; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE4F21F8757; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.21
Message-ID: <20120627135256.11457.74759.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:52:56 -0700
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-03.txt> (DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry Updates) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

The IESG has received a request from the DNS Extensions WG (dnsext) to
consider the following document:
- 'DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm IANA Registry Updates'
  <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update-03.txt> as Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-07-11. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) requires the use of
   cryptographic algorithm suites for generating digital signatures over
   DNS data.  The algorithms specified for use with DNSSEC are reflected
   in an IANA maintained registry.  This document presents a set of
   changes for some entries of the registry.

Note that this document responds to the objections raised against
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08; the earlier document was
split into this document and draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status.
This document specifies the changes to the registry that were
considered non-controversial during the review of
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-08.

The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-update/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.


_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext