Re: Fw: Approval to Post Version -00 Internet-Drafts for the 61st IETF Meeting in Washington, DC, USA

[Mike StJohns <[e-mail]>]

Without objection - I'll post my draft as a working group draft by the end 
of the week.


At 11:24 AM 9/27/2004, Ólafur Gudmundsson/DNSEXT co-chair wrote:
>At 11:07 27/09/2004, Mike StJohns wrote:
>>Is there agreement to accept 
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stjohns-dnssec-trustupdate-01.txt 
>>"Automated Updates of DNSSEC Trust Anchors" as a WG draft?  If so, I'll 
>>repost it as draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-trustupdate-00.txt.
>
>Does anyone in the working group object that we admit the this document and
>the Threshold key validation schema described in
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ihren-dnsext-threshold-validation-01.txt? 
>
>
>It was the sense of the room in San Diego to admit these documents
>as working group items, but we chairs forgot to officially ask this
>question on the mailing list.
>
>The reason to do this work in DNSEXT is that one or both these
>proposals want to use bits in the DNSKEY record for signaling of
>state change(s).
>
>         Olafur DNSEXT co-chair
>
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>