Re: [dnsext] New ID submitted
Shane Kerr <shane@isc.org> Mon, 10 October 2011 08:58 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B8821F8B31; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1318237109; bh=19p9dMQZj2cE6cNCqDKpDzs1j/VohNWvta4v+5cgq2M=; h=From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Mime-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=dxNNZm6BUWgMR+wKZMuREPv00H4ETWw1GIuC5OIFHMWeWG6VeOhyfJIJt/HSd2yFf gYpcR0BwM4bCyNPUIxk/OMJtSS6oIqEo9TBszc5sCr0XDmmxeZ/yC2Ca3TH+6Q/JZ1 TtwvnvMyoT2a85hzAr26GUzLs1vo/sMOQl14Ojx0=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21D921F8B46 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.741
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.741 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sug8XlpHdVvs for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA46C21F8B31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 01:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bikeshed.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 784A3C941E; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shane@isc.org)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:610:719:1:beae:c5ff:fe43:aa00] (unknown [IPv6:2001:610:719:1:beae:c5ff:fe43:aa00]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72776216C6A; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shane@isc.org)
From: Shane Kerr <shane@isc.org>
To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:58:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <a06240801cab4b6febee6@[10.31.203.207]>
References: <4E8C12CC.3090701@nic.cz> <a06240804cab200031f9c@[10.31.203.207]> <Prayer.1.3.4.1110051450060.28254@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <a06240800cab22aa31db5@[10.31.203.207]> <a06240801cab4b6febee6@[10.31.203.207]>
Organization: ISC
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15)
Message-ID: <1318237086.2457.13.camel@shane-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] New ID submitted
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Ed, I think this document is useful, and support it going forward. On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 10:06 -0400, Edward Lewis wrote: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce/current/msg40107.html > > Out of frustration trying to locate information on the more obscure > RR type registrations at IANA, I drew up this draft. Comments? > > Yes, there are spelling errors...in the abstract. From the announcement: > > Title : IANA Allocated DNS RRtyp Codes without Documentation s/RRtyp/RRtype/ > Author(s) : E. Lewis > Filename : draft-lewis-dns-undocumented-types-00.txt > Pages : 3 > Date : 2011-10-06 We did some digging recently when documenting RRTypes for BIND 10. For EID and NIMLOC, there is this document: http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/nimrod/dns.txt Which seems to be a -01 version of the draft listed in your document. There are some differences in the text (for example it says "protocol spec [[[ref to be supplied]]]" rather than "protocol [[[ref to be supplied]]]"), but I don't know if these are meaningful. (Surely not for such a vintage routing architecture.) For the rest, you came up with the same references we did. FWIW, our list of lower-priority RR types is here: http://bind10.isc.org/wiki/RRTypes We don't have all the ones you list, because I considered many of them to be works in progress (CDS, URI, CAA, ...). -- Shane _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] RETRY and EXPIRE clarification Lubos Slovak
- Re: [dnsext] RETRY and EXPIRE clarification Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] RETRY and EXPIRE clarification Chris Thompson
- Re: [dnsext] RETRY and EXPIRE clarification Edward Lewis
- [dnsext] New ID submitted Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] New ID submitted weiler
- Re: [dnsext] New ID submitted Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] New ID submitted Shane Kerr
- Re: [dnsext] New ID submitted Edward Lewis