Re: [dnsext] Signaling ENDS option understanding in draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-01
Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> Fri, 30 March 2012 13:59 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DB421F86D0; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333115956; bh=3g6Obe54SYpvti/gTRe68UtacqreeEfGVJSWjbH84eQ=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Sender; b=HkvdPRmVCzpMu/nYUMYFDJmE6vekmPLFcUh7IsQOLRwTSnjLjOx9gKffQSqNRhvLZ tqNAaEHyQzF77meYsW94+CwCKJNGdD1+FOxw8wO+lPRXbgPIJM7VzDTKsJqBP/t1M7 e/TJRgXVuNpdth/M/lep9BL3CSLmnEH+8hU0NoqI=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1028F21F86D0 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0cG06vQZvJL for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f172.google.com (mail-qc0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA3621F86CA for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcsq13 with SMTP id q13so448600qcs.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=g+W4NXmNgqg0D2BcH5GQGPDbEDHK4daFA2VvhXuNqQ0=; b=xBT3am1S91NPsmkTRoZjXuRdZ/BLx0c2Uyx3p8MkvmOsmxsvZ3wmnUo1C4Fn+i0vNS mfxl3alrWI2s/zdSzDA6uBBdakZGm9DVdSjQjmy8UE6kIhM7QktfRvCI3msV+4vM0Qpn dFDQrfyIbWVIchWNuarrKr1xkoG9lNQTlO+uIvfiX1sY1Y/Jssj/zb1z0JpSOUILi20j AC7SYCrnQXIIYqXhfYaoe0yTreDD/kwWq5ApnMCXnZc6p4ySHIO6nmafTlKi0dRYAyBP f28gVfWkRMbMSywJ15vjHRJo8hCmJttI756bLuT/H6NxHPQxNrl3/bWwwXmENsfeopqN CMuQ==
Received: by 10.224.221.146 with SMTP id ic18mr5452312qab.71.1333115954687; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.92.71 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DBC3C50C-10A7-4980-8B97-64FC7F1CAA8F@nominet.org.uk>
References: <201203292010.WAA20455@TR-Sys.de> <DBC3C50C-10A7-4980-8B97-64FC7F1CAA8F@nominet.org.uk>
From: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:58:54 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6OJ7wdmn6mu4LreMEOOZDIlX4Mc
Message-ID: <CAKW6Ri40BwTKwmihJNxNSGH3cfjU0rLq868L+xj0xsGwi2K+pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
Cc: Alfred HÎnes <ah@tr-sys.de>, "<dnsext@ietf.org>" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Signaling ENDS option understanding in draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes-01
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3068368182389692537=="
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Ray, On 30 March 2012 10:27, Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> wrote: > > That said, I'm _kind of_ OK with Dick's proposal that the response use a > different option code instead of using the QTD bit. That's consistent with > ICMP, although off the top of my head I'm not aware of any other part of > DNS that does this. > ICMP ECHO was indeed the model I had in mind. Regards --Dick
_______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- Re: [dnsext] Signaling ENDS option understanding … Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] Signaling ENDS option understanding … Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Signaling ENDS option understanding … Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Signaling ENDS option understanding … Ray Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] Signaling ENDS option understanding … Dick Franks