[dnsext] AD bit
Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Sun, 04 March 2012 20:53 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF0221F8648; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:53:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1330894435; bh=7SkcqY4RG4+k+OAup3JXKkDlnDnwHZKp55pIcfb1h+Q=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Sender; b=qgW0idXKkjqRdEkVlcY17OwJCtL4sTTsBf4UeSrOVeBozI6DfxnR+uM0Qyjb14LKv vRojWcb9i2inGnv5Rrr+OP1HXcNlo9FKtVfjvvqfTFyFl2XEDc5ULgMo5G9VOdPCbe srS2s5pzzvdPhCExfgryzaXEgrQo1CUwvahvbZNs=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA1121F8630 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:53:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.372
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.372 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.261, BAYES_05=-1.11, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NysLHmiZGaq7 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:53:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (cl-201.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:c8::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D2A21F862F for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:53:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B13193FF30; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:53:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 21:53:47 +0100
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: dnsext list <dnsext@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20120304205347.GA17454@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: dnsext list <dnsext@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Subject: [dnsext] AD bit
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8408982216934539332=="
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Hello,
As RFC 4035 obsoletes both RFC 3655 and RFC 2535, what document should
be used to find the definition of the AD and CD bits in the message header?
Regards,
--
Miek Gieben
_______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] AD bit Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] AD bit Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] AD bit Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] AD bit Mark Andrews