[dnsext] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Joao Damas <joao@bondis.org> Mon, 13 February 2012 16:57 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A38121F8489; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:57:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1329152253; bh=hnRDmdODvCwPhE8W1esCQEwruFcqNb1zlfLyh5GxdAE=; h=From:Date:References:To:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Sender; b=rVm1Dgt0EVxxyRero1gN+i4ulvHd5IgS0tAQVUz/FMc3JWvC6FChuGItvHa4aPWF6 ySP3j0JVNM3JKbWAW5Bpq0NkNrmsjeWcztE3q9Zh4YgelqbyjPdQmxkynUNaUHfYMR J4RKwFYV1WQPes8/gAa0LzSkeJJJISEZcCq7knig=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCF821F848C for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:57:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXmDXafg5dDs for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF28921F8486 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bikeshed.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (verified OK)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD7185F9887 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@bondis.org)
Received: from dhcp-wifi-243.sql1.isc.org (unknown [149.20.50.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8346B216C6A for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:57:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@bondis.org)
From: Joao Damas <joao@bondis.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:57:04 -0800
References: <20120212132336.7D61E62047C@smtp1.bondis.org>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-Id: <74470642-8004-4AD1-99DD-8DEA3B3B3BA1@bondis.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Subject: [dnsext] Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3150390802239418188=="
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
resending as this apparently never made it through to the list Joao Begin forwarded message: > > From: João Damas <joao@bondis.org> > Subject: Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt > Date: 7 February 2012 05:05:19 PST > To: dnsext@ietf.org > > > Most edits in this version are for typo-like stuff. > > One item worth noting is that this i-d now explicitly obsoletes RFC2673 (binary labels) as they depend on extended labels which are all also wrapped-up as part of this update to RFC2671. > > Also, given the age of RFC2671 the boilerplate has been updated. > > I believe all other comments had been addressed on the previous version of the i-d. > > Joao > > On 7 Feb 2012, at 14:01, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote: > >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the DNS Extensions Working Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0) >> Author(s) : Joao Damas >> Michael Graff >> Paul Vixie >> Filename : draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt >> Pages : 15 >> Date : 2012-02-07 >> >> The Domain Name System's wire protocol includes a number of fixed >> fields whose range has been or soon will be exhausted and does not >> allow requestors to advertise their capabilities to responders. This >> document describes backward compatible mechanisms for allowing the >> protocol to grow. >> >> This document updates the EDNS0 specification (RFC 2671) based on >> feedback from deployment experience in several implementations. It >> also closes the IANA registry for extended labels created as part of >> RFC 2671 and obsoletes RFC 2673 ("Binary Labels in the Domain Name >> System") which depends on the existence of extended labels. >> >> >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dnsext mailing list >> dnsext@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext > > >
_______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext