Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode-00.txt> (xNAME RCODE and Status Bits Clarification) to Proposed Standard
SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 25 January 2012 04:43 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4ED11E80AE; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:43:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1327466593; bh=ToeiWZjMx/uVDwWfwwIXKTUMA5BuJgYx7CSknKm0B+A=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender; b=dNFgFVs2gndK0hbouRtDTniRlJM9HCU2jb/j/CUa9wFRP7yiOa+njvLj7iDMopB9t oIDKDDJQvJwwHYi0LBFIKfCH8URdyuusmBoRoEfLApG/TKitrJVh/MlUqyINoY7KyM 3sigRWWkygg2AFuW1EP1mCZr9mEigcPqrkQ3vSsM=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC64811E80AE for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:43:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.625
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yCnLCW1BY4oO for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:43:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD5311E80A5 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:43:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0P4h0US002015; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:43:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1327466586; i=@resistor.net; bh=G+OnbFDA/ripELmz81gqfI0cpeA+YV9E8QeA991agQw=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=AbQdu4XMwpdWY5xch/Gn7tMXygd2kZ1JgypKYAV2k+ztHEvl7t00/aZrCNZL5zplW Q3J8HGfSrCxJS4Fe29xV7OWlSNDazcnrFB1VR2F5jAl4oRKPusjaC9KDcYj2BUDlbO jh3ViaZjgDB1m5zS1LWmicugUhAiP3+Q3HdYaw/I=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1327466586; i=@resistor.net; bh=G+OnbFDA/ripELmz81gqfI0cpeA+YV9E8QeA991agQw=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=xiAZiRVdFBuXJhM4wTzdH5RkWwYj1ppxqp99Ct1J2Am62X4bb7jUkS8mxJJutm48W O9wugOciJDVPIWX1HCzcEhDgmTqeAoIjCJAEzERL2/37s4NtK+IXSF3HWTvtdrOeis JyMJ0+euUa50KaESB76FeZWDU5aCyqMkN+aStJDQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120124203632.09c401a8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:39:45 -0800
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEGVZiLOZcdFMY0um6-Go98=sjQOnMN2+GGFNnOK=vxXbw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20120123182317.28636.48689.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120123103439.0a87a228@resistor.net> <CAF4+nEGVZiLOZcdFMY0um6-Go98=sjQOnMN2+GGFNnOK=vxXbw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-xnamercode-00.txt> (xNAME RCODE and Status Bits Clarification) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Donald, At 19:46 24-01-2012, Donald Eastlake wrote: >Actually, the last sentence above is not duplicated in the draft. Sorry about that; the mistake is at my end. >This draft brings together the aspects of the AA, AD, and RCODE bits >related to xNAME RR query cycles and expresses them clearly and >succinctly. As such it has been approved by the DNSEXT WG. I do not >believe that text has to make a change to be a clarification. Thanks for the clarification. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext