IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnsext] Re: [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification for draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Thu, 01 July 2010 08:48 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC1D3A67E5; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 01:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.279
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.279 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.784, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YHPq1cRhuOkk; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 01:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D8B3A67C3; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 01:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OUFMq-000Pbv-CX for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:43:32 +0000
Received: from [192.100.122.230] (helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <lars.eggert@nokia.com>) id 1OUFMm-000Pb6-IB for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:43:29 +0000
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o618gquO019847; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:43:09 +0300
Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:43:08 +0300
Received: from mgw-sa01.ext.nokia.com ([147.243.1.47]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:43:08 +0300
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa01.ext.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o618h7Jp022030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:43:07 +0300
Subject: [dnsext] Re: [port-srv-reg] New Version Notification for draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-4--981131304"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <201006301801.UAA26017@TR-Sys.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:42:59 +0100
Cc: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports@tools.IETF.ORG
Message-Id: <398CC265-20E3-4E97-8A36-E8CED3B6E0B8@nokia.com>
References: <201006301801.UAA26017@TR-Sys.de>
To: ah@tr-sys.de
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.5 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:43:00 +0300 (EEST)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2010 08:43:08.0240 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E0C1500:01CB18F9]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Hi,

On 2010-6-30, at 19:01, ah@tr-sys.de wrote:
> Please do not neglect the criticism spelled out repeatedly for
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports but rejected by your team.  This
> draft tries to accommodate the restrictions imposed by that memo.
> Yet, to be useful for aligning previous RFCs now deemed non-
> conformant with these rules and recent/ongoing work specifically
> calling for multi-label hierarchical Service Prefixes, this
> draft needs to show a uniform path that can be recommended
> to the authors / WGs where these RFCs are originating from.
> 
> Thus, as a replacement mechanism for specifications using
> Service Prefixes with non-transport protocol Protocol Labels
> and/or more than two labels, the non-normative extension
> mechanism proposed is an essential part of this memo.
> 
> Unless the restrictions imposed by draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports
> on the lenght of Service Names and the one-servie-name-per-
> application rule are being relaxed substantially, this extension
> mechanism will remain in this document.

OK, I'm confused. We had a lunch meeting in Anaheim where Olafur was present, and we went down the list of planned changes to iana-ports to explicitly make sure the two documents are aligned.

If they now are not aligned, there are basically two possibilities: Either we we messed things up when updating iana-ports, but I at least don't know where we did. Or draft-gudmundsson changed or is planned to change in ways that are different than what we agreed on.

Can we pencil in a time for a Webex call in order to make progress here?

Lars

PS: Let's please try to take the heat out of this discussion. It's unhelpful.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email