[dnsext] New proposed charter for WG
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Tue, 07 September 2010 15:07 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9153A69F4; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.832
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.832 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.767, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 091fO6JSNG5A; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879AC3A693F; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1OszhF-00065T-E4 for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:02:53 +0000
Received: from mail.yitter.info ([208.86.224.201]) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <ajs@shinkuro.com>) id 1OszhB-00064l-Nr for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:02:49 +0000
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (69-196-144-230.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A4FC1ECB41D for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:02:42 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:02:37 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] New proposed charter for WG
Message-ID: <20100907150237.GL489@shinkuro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
Dear colleagues, In light of the recent discussions both on the list and in person, the chairs propose the following new charter for the WG. In Maastricht we committed to closing this topic by 15 September. We'd like to send this to our AD on the 15th. Your comments are solicited. We are aware that there are some who object to the second bullet if it opens the possibility of adopting the dnscurve work. On balance, we have concluded that it would be better to leave that possibility open without committing to a particular course of action. Note that this proposed charter explicitly pushes adoption of BNAME, SHADOW, or any other proposals for solving the aliasing issues until after we have made some progress on the problem statement. Best regards, Andrew and Olafur DRAFT charter for DNSEXT, 2010-09-07. SUBJECT TO CHANGE Description of Working Group: The DNS has a large installed base and repertoire of protocol specifications. The DNSEXT working group will actively advance DNS protocol-related RFCs on the standards track while thoroughly reviewing further proposed extensions. The scope of the DNSEXT WG is confined to the DNS protocol, particularly changes that affect DNS protocols "on the wire" or the internal processing of DNS data. DNS operations are out of scope for the WG. The WG will consider work in the following areas: * DNSSEC and TSIG/TKEY algorithm maintenance; * Mechanisms that complement, or are alternatives to, TSIG and SIG(0); * Hardening DNS protocol and providing guidance to implementers; * Advancing existing DNS-related Proposed Standard RFCs to Draft/Full Standard; * Obsoleting DNS-related RFCs; * Improving DNS zone synchronization mechanisms; * Examining transport protocols, possibly adding new ones; * Mechanisms to alias DNS trees or parts thereof. Before formal adoption of any work item at least 5 working group participants must publicly state that the item is within charter and is a worthwhile item for further study. The DNSEXT WG will conduct the specified RFC5395 review of RR templates as they are posted, and EDNS0 Option templates if EDNS0-bis updates registration requirements. The WG will review DNS protocol related work which may originate elsewhere in the IETF, including AD-sponsored submissions or drafts in other working group. Goals and Milestones: Sept 2010 RFC3597-bis Unknown RR advanced to IESG for PS Sept 2010 DNSKEY Registry fixes and allocation procedure advanced to IESG Oct 2010 DNSSEC Errata document to IESG Oct 2010 DNAME-bis to IESG Nov 2010 EDNS0-bis update advanced to IESG Nov 2010 Aliasing requirements and current state survey document to IESG Nov 2010 Decision about new protocol elements, if any, for aliasing Dec 2010 If new protocol elements, recharter Dec 2010 IXFR-only to IESG Jan 2010 Algorithm signaling document to IESG -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc.
- [dnsext] New proposed charter for WG Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] New proposed charter for WG Andrew Sullivan