Re: [nat66] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-blake-nptv6-icmp-01.txt]

["Dan Wing" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Blake [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 9:48 PM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: 'nat66'; Terry Moës
> Subject: Re: [nat66] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-blake-nptv6-icmp-01.txt]
> 
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 00:38 -0500, Steven Blake wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 16:58 -0800, Dan Wing wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for forwarding a pointer to that document.
> > >
> > > You might also see RFC5508, "NAT Behavioral Requirements for ICMP".
> > > RFC5508 includes a reference to ICMP Extensions (RFC4884) which,
> while
> > > rare in the wild, are probably worth describing so they are handled
> > > properly.  Hairpinning of ICMP messages may also be worth pointing
> out
> > > to implementers (so that pinging the 'external' address works,
> among
> > > other things).  It might be worth also pointing out that ICMP echo
> > > request/reply doesn't require special handling.
> >
> > Thanks for the pointers Dan.  I was unaware of RFCs 5508 and 4884.
> We
> > will take a look and revise as you suggest.
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> I just submitted http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-blake-nptv6-icmp-02
> today.  I hope that it addresses your comments.

Yes, thanks.  One small nit that I will email separately.

-d


> If there are no more review comments on the draft, we will request
> publication as an individual submission.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> // Steve