IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nat66] Comments on draft-mrw-nat66-12

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Tue, 15 March 2011 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: nat66@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nat66@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D2C3A6EFB for <nat66@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wX7xvi824ddz for <nat66@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E663A6ECA for <nat66@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay11.apple.com (relay11.apple.com [17.128.113.48]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390BED93C00F for <nat66@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807130-b7b5eae000005ccb-dd-4d7ff2596bbc
Received: from elliott.apple.com (elliott.apple.com [17.151.62.13]) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id CE.F4.23755.952FF7D4; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Received: from [17.193.13.64] by elliott.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LI400E0RGGO1Q20@elliott.apple.com> for nat66@ietf.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <758DD037-9DC2-4A1E-BEAE-7E99CBED6D3A@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:12:24 -0700
Message-id: <5E3E1015-9750-4ADA-91D9-F10FFFDB2BD0@apple.com>
References: <20110314063002.28048.29694.idtracker@localhost> <19F3A4CD-F39C-4F17-A6E9-7AA8AFBC6B3B@cisco.com> <CF8367A6-F303-43D7-99C6-D40D1DD5D5D9@free.fr> <125BC580-ED43-40EE-B6B9-FD88557C35B9@apple.com> <758DD037-9DC2-4A1E-BEAE-7E99CBED6D3A@cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1207)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: NAT66 HappyFunBall <nat66@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nat66] Comments on draft-mrw-nat66-12
X-BeenThere: nat66@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of IPv6-to-IPv6 NAT." <nat66.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66>, <mailto:nat66-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nat66>
List-Post: <mailto:nat66@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nat66-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66>, <mailto:nat66-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:11:02 -0000

On Mar 15, 2011, at 15:51 , Fred Baker wrote:
> 
> To my mind, section 5 spends quite a bit of effort indicating that there are issues around differences in addresses.

It does, but I think there might be room to improve section 2.4 further by discussing the problem of choosing the correct valid and preferred lifetimes for routers advertising the internal network prefix.  There may also be ramifications for firewalls that implement I-D.ietf-pcp-base.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, core os networking

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email