[Nea] What's new in PA-TNC 06 revision
"Paul Sangster" <Paul_Sangster@symantec.com> Fri, 30 October 2009 15:40 UTC
Return-Path: <Paul_Sangster@symantec.com>
X-Original-To: nea@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nea@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95493A67E6 for <nea@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9zu0JoW9NfWx for <nea@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from extu-mxob-1.symantec.com (extu-mxob-1.symantec.com [216.10.194.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4293A6782 for <nea@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tus1opsmtapin01.ges.symantec.com (tus1opsmtapin01.ges.symantec.com [192.168.214.43]) by extu-mxob-1.symantec.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n9UFeQlm030332 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <nea@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:40:28 -0700
Received: from reserved-155-64-230-19.ges.symantec.com ([155.64.230.19] helo=TUS1XCHECNPIN02.enterprise.veritas.com) by tus1opsmtapin01.ges.symantec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <Paul_Sangster@symantec.com>) id 1N3taU-00082C-4F for nea@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:40:26 -0700
Received: from TUS1XCHEVSPIN05.enterprise.veritas.com ([155.64.231.27]) by TUS1XCHECNPIN02.enterprise.veritas.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:40:26 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA5977.4D0B2AB8"
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:40:24 -0700
Message-ID: <AB96CED633A7C246BDC661DBEE1CF01F07F9793C@TUS1XCHCLUPIN11.enterprise.veritas.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: What's new in PA-TNC 06 revision
thread-index: AcpZd0v84lrFtxgVSoG0ytVpoDKqqg==
From: Paul Sangster <Paul_Sangster@symantec.com>
To: nea@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2009 15:40:26.0167 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D058C70:01CA5977]
Subject: [Nea] What's new in PA-TNC 06 revision
X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list <nea.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nea>
List-Post: <mailto:nea@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:40:17 -0000
Last week I posted a new version of the PA-TNC draft that includes updates to address comments received during the IESG review including those discussed at IETF 75. These revisions include: o Removal of remaining references to PA-TNC security protocol (which the WG opt'ed not to standardize) o Additional text about how PT will protect the PA-TNC message exchanges o Updates to IANA Considerations to lower expectations during expert reviews of vendor-defined values o Clarification on errors when receiving malformed PA-TNC message or attributes Overall the number and size of the changes to the document were small hopefully suggestion we have stability in the specification. Thanks, Paul
- [Nea] What's new in PA-TNC 06 revision Paul Sangster