RE: [nemo] Potential conflict on NEMOv4 Type and FA-ERR Type

["Narayanan, Vidya" <[e-mail]>]

Sounds good to me.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 9:51 AM
> To: ml-nemo WG
> Subject: [nemo] Potential conflict on NEMOv4 Type and FA-ERR Type
> 
> I've been pointed that there seems to be a potential conflict 
> on NEMOv4 Mobile Network Extension Type and FA-Err Type.
> 
> NEMOv4 uses a new Type (to be assigned by IANA) in Mobile 
> Network Extension.  We suggested in the draft that it be 45.
> 
> FA-ERR draft-ietf-mip4-faerr-02.txt uses Type 45 for FA Error 
> Extension (already assigned by IANA).  The draft does not 
> specify 45, just says TBA by IANA.  IANA seems to have 
> assigned it, see http://www.iana.org/assignments/mobileip-numbers.
> 
> draft-ietf-mobileip-gen-key-01.txt implemented in dynamics 
> 0.8.1 uses 45 too, but I think this can be ignored, because  
> I think this work has been evolved into draft-rfc3012bis 
> which uses Type 24.
> 
> To solve the issue between NEMOv4 and FA-ERR I suggest that 
> we use Type
> 46 - and not 45 - in NEMOv4 implementation, until IANA 
> assigns a Type for NEMOv4 Mobile Network Extension.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Alex
> 
>